Re: She issues another statement claiming she was 'mistaken by a few months'
User logged in as Susan T
|
There's a whole lot of questions that should be asked. Regardless of who wrote the letter, why send it to the Met? They have no jurisdiction over what an American gets up to in the US or Mexico. If it was Tom Sr's first wife, it makes even less sense to send it to the Met. The woman has grandchildren (and possibly even great-grandchildren), yet her first concern is the safety of the unborn child of the daughter of his second wife? Nobody in the family acts out of altruism. They all have an agenda and form alliances based on the belief that "my enemy's enemy is my friend" until joining the other side looks like it would be more beneficial.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report - Martha October 22, 2026, 6:44 pm
- Re: Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report - karenl October 22, 2026, 8:25 pm
- Met Police did not launch child sex probe into Thomas Markle - as force hunts for 2018 letter - Martha October 23, 2026, 1:20 pm
- Interesting analysis posted on Reddit - Susan T October 23, 2026, 7:52 pm
- Her lies and spinning are horrible - Hollie24 October 24, 2026, 12:33 am
- Met Police Statement - Karen October 24, 2026, 9:52 am
- Re: Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report - Cynthia October 25, 2026, 1:18 am
- Re: Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report - Hollie24 October 25, 2026, 4:07 am
- Signs suggest Thomas Markle Sr may be ‘sex offender of the grossest kind’, says Philippine minister - Jessie October 25, 2026, 7:14 am
 « Index | View all » |