Re: Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report
User logged in as karenl
|
I could see why the Queen was on the fence, at the time the public and media were going on about Meghan being biracial and how wonderful it was. A refusal to let them marry would have brought all kinds of uproar and outcry. The same public that turned on Meghan a short couple of years later.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report - Martha October 22, 2026, 6:44 pm
- Re: Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report - karenl October 22, 2026, 8:25 pm
- Met Police did not launch child sex probe into Thomas Markle - as force hunts for 2018 letter - Martha October 23, 2026, 1:20 pm
- Interesting analysis posted on Reddit - Susan T October 23, 2026, 7:52 pm
- Her lies and spinning are horrible - Hollie24 October 24, 2026, 12:33 am
- Met Police Statement - Karen October 24, 2026, 9:52 am
- Re: Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report - Cynthia October 25, 2026, 1:18 am
- Re: Thomas Markle under investigation for ‘hundreds, if not thousands’ of child porn images: report - Hollie24 October 25, 2026, 4:07 am
- Signs suggest Thomas Markle Sr may be ‘sex offender of the grossest kind’, says Philippine minister - Jessie October 25, 2026, 7:14 am
« Index | View all » |