Re: RHR Jen
Posted by Susan T on September 7, 2026, 4:47 pm, in reply to "
RHR Jen"
User logged in as Susan T
|
They could not use the word "Royal" as part of their brand name in the UK. That's not the same thing as never being able to speak or write the word "Royal" in an advertisement. Anybody can claim that their product will provide a "royal experience" or make you feel like a "royal" (or a king, queen, prince, or princess, etc.) I loathe the twosome, but people need to keep a sense of proportion about what they can and can't do. Or what Charles can or can't do regarding their behavior.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- Sep 7 - them - Susan T September 7, 2026, 12:03 pm
- They are still not working royals after return to Britain - Susan T September 7, 2026, 12:07 pm
- Re: They are still not working royals after return to Britain - Cynthia September 7, 2026, 12:41 pm
- Re: They are still not working royals after return to Britain - Karen September 7, 2026, 12:45 pm
- Re: They are still not working royals after return to Britain - Martha September 7, 2026, 12:56 pm
- Video from GB News - Karen September 7, 2026, 12:58 pm
- Re: They are still not working royals after return to Britain - Hollie24 September 7, 2026, 2:38 pm
- RHR Jen - Hollie24 September 7, 2026, 4:29 pm
- Re: RHR Jen - Susan T September 7, 2026, 4:47 pm
- Taz - Hollie24 September 7, 2026, 5:40 pm
- They are 'surprised' by King's letter making clear they remain non-working royals - Karen September 8, 2026, 5:27 am
 « Index | View all » |