Re: nets
Posted by JK on April 17, 2012, 3:56 pm, in reply to "
Re: nets"
|
I think that one foot in a small area like te tennis courts is huge. In a league that people consistently score from behind half. We will see more shots from further away turning it into a basketball game.
Again I am open to both options but no one besides you or poon are presenting any reason to move to the 72.
Goalies any thoughts
Surba
James
Simran
Ragu
Amit
Ragu
Gurdev
Harman
|
 |
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- nets - JK April 16, 2012, 10:09 am
- Re: nets - 99 April 16, 2012, 10:26 am
- Re: nets - Aman April 16, 2012, 11:35 am
- Re: nets - question April 16, 2012, 12:18 pm
- Re: nets - JK April 16, 2012, 12:35 pm
- Re: nets - PooN April 16, 2012, 3:03 pm
- Re: nets - Mav April 16, 2012, 3:25 pm
- Re: nets - sabi April 16, 2012, 5:41 pm
- Re: nets - JK April 16, 2012, 7:32 pm
- Re: nets - bhabhi April 17, 2012, 9:19 am
- Re: nets - Mav April 17, 2012, 3:17 pm
- Re: nets - JK April 17, 2012, 3:56 pm
- Re: nets - Obi Wan Kenobi April 17, 2012, 4:32 pm
- Re: nets - gogs April 17, 2012, 5:21 pm
- Re: nets - gogs April 17, 2012, 5:36 pm
- Re: nets - Surba April 17, 2012, 9:22 pm
- Re: nets - Poon April 17, 2012, 10:29 pm
- Re: nets - Poon April 17, 2012, 10:51 pm
- Re: nets - Amit April 18, 2012, 9:17 am
- Re: nets - JK April 18, 2012, 10:21 am
- Re: nets - Obi Wan Kenobi April 18, 2012, 10:21 am
- Re: nets - 99 April 18, 2012, 2:33 pm
- Re: nets - R.S April 18, 2012, 2:50 pm
- Re: nets - EIHL MGT April 18, 2012, 2:55 pm
- Re: nets - JK April 18, 2012, 3:09 pm
- Re: nets - EIHL MGT/Poon April 18, 2012, 4:08 pm
« Back to index |
