Re: nets
Posted by Mav on April 17, 2012, 3:17 pm, in reply to "
Re: nets"
|
Hello Jessie, The following compares the 60" vs 72"; 60" x 44" x 22" Steel Hockey Goal 72" x 48" in x 35" NHL Style Steel Hockey goal - 6" increase on each side for the width - 4" increase on the height - 13" increase in the depth of the net Is the increase to 72" that much more significant than keeping to the 60" we currently have? I don't think it's that much of a big change, as some of our goalies have played in similar style nets in the SBHL or even in the Brampton/Mississauga OBHA leauges. If still at crossroads, then I would suggest to contact each goalie on every team and ask them to vote for staying in the 60" or moving to 72" size.
|
 |
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- nets - JK April 16, 2012, 10:09 am
- Re: nets - 99 April 16, 2012, 10:26 am
- Re: nets - Aman April 16, 2012, 11:35 am
- Re: nets - question April 16, 2012, 12:18 pm
- Re: nets - JK April 16, 2012, 12:35 pm
- Re: nets - PooN April 16, 2012, 3:03 pm
- Re: nets - Mav April 16, 2012, 3:25 pm
- Re: nets - sabi April 16, 2012, 5:41 pm
- Re: nets - JK April 16, 2012, 7:32 pm
- Re: nets - bhabhi April 17, 2012, 9:19 am
- Re: nets - Mav April 17, 2012, 3:17 pm
- Re: nets - JK April 17, 2012, 3:56 pm
- Re: nets - Obi Wan Kenobi April 17, 2012, 4:32 pm
- Re: nets - gogs April 17, 2012, 5:21 pm
- Re: nets - gogs April 17, 2012, 5:36 pm
- Re: nets - Surba April 17, 2012, 9:22 pm
- Re: nets - Poon April 17, 2012, 10:29 pm
- Re: nets - Poon April 17, 2012, 10:51 pm
- Re: nets - Amit April 18, 2012, 9:17 am
- Re: nets - JK April 18, 2012, 10:21 am
- Re: nets - Obi Wan Kenobi April 18, 2012, 10:21 am
- Re: nets - 99 April 18, 2012, 2:33 pm
- Re: nets - R.S April 18, 2012, 2:50 pm
- Re: nets - EIHL MGT April 18, 2012, 2:55 pm
- Re: nets - JK April 18, 2012, 3:09 pm
- Re: nets - EIHL MGT/Poon April 18, 2012, 4:08 pm
 « Back to index |