Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by Susan T on November 19, 2025, 8:45 am

n/t

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by Cynthia on November 19, 2025, 6:31 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

In the DM: she's on the new cover of Bazaar. It looks awful!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-15307731/meghan-markle-poses-cover-harpers-bazaar-magazine.html

This message is locked.

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by Hollie24 on November 19, 2025, 6:56 pm, in reply to "Re: November 19 - twerking royals"

That is an awful photo, as is the one with her in the red sack. Whoever did the Photoshopping did a terrible job. Her head looks way too small for her body.

As bad as that cover is,though, the article is even worse.

This message is locked.

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by karenl on November 19, 2025, 7:47 pm, in reply to "Re: November 19 - twerking royals"

Meghan's in the "art" issue? Oh please. She's just following what other celebs have been doing lately. It all started with Pamela Anderson going without make up, Gwynth Paltrow went to some event last week end make up free and Kim Kardashian plus one of her sisters posted selfies of themselves without make up.
Meghan definitely looks terrible, the stress is showing plus age, years in the sun plus smoking, imbibing in recreational drugs, drinking. The outfits are hideous, that red thing looks like a bed sheet thrown over her. I love the way the author in the article brought up her photo and story in The Cut....yeah, how well did that go? She's desperate for PR. The article is pretty barfy.

This message is locked.

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by Cynthia on November 19, 2025, 8:05 pm, in reply to "Re: November 19 - twerking royals"

She smokes? I didn't realise! So much for such clean living!

This message is locked.

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by Hollie24 on November 19, 2025, 9:11 pm, in reply to "Re: November 19 - twerking royals"

IIRC she and Twerk smoke natural herbs and spices pretty much every day.

This message is locked.

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by karenl on November 19, 2025, 9:22 pm, in reply to "Re: November 19 - twerking royals"

Meghan did smoke regular cigarettes for quite a while. I remember Tudor did a video about it being said how bad her breath was and that she not only had the bad breath from cigarettes, but her clothes reeked of smoke. Now they reek of pot and her breath probably does too, I'm sure.
I don't think she and the dimwit practice the best of oral hygiene, heaven knows neither practice much of any hygiene.

This message is locked.

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by Arlene on November 20, 2025, 9:48 am, in reply to "Re: November 19 - twerking royals"

Hideous photo and let's just say, she is not aging well!

This message is locked.

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by Hollie24 on November 20, 2025, 12:34 pm, in reply to "Re: November 19 - twerking royals"

The article is even worse. It's all about how Twerk loves her and supports her and basically worships her as a goddess. Nary a word about how she loves and supports him. Narcissism on full display.

This message is locked.

Re: November 19 - twerking royals

Posted by Hollie24 on November 20, 2025, 1:04 pm, in reply to "Re: November 19 - twerking royals"

"She said of Harry: 'He loves me so boldly, fully, and he also has a different perspective because he sees media that I wouldn't.'

'No one in the world loves me more than him, so I know he's always going to make sure that he has my back,' she continued."

It sounds like she's basing her personality on what media outlets are saying and that Harry has no opinion of his own.

This message is locked.

Meghan speaks out after Balenciaga designer revealed she invited herself to Paris fashion week

Posted by Martha on November 19, 2025, 7:47 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

https://nypost.com/2025/11/19/entertainment/meghan-markle-speaks-out-after-balenciaga-designer-revealed-she-invited-herself-to-paris-fashion-week/

===

This message is locked.

How Bazaar - The Slops of Meghan's Mind

Posted by Hollie24 on November 20, 2025, 4:05 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

Tudor analyzes Twerkette's Harpers Bazaar interview. Twerk somehow found the time to buy her diamond earrings when he visited Ukraine earlier. Did we miss her visit to the Tar Pits?

This message is locked.

Beebs

Posted by Hollie24 on November 20, 2025, 10:34 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

More on Twerkette's Christmas promo and the insane interview in Harper's Bazaar.

This message is locked.

Tudor

Posted by Hollie24 on November 20, 2025, 11:47 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

I think she had these photos taken by someone other than a Harper's Bazaar staff photographer. And she has to have paid the magazine to accept said photos. There is no other way to explain how awful they are. There is also no way any professional photographer would include these in their portfolio. The whole thing is so far beyond bad I have no words.

This message is locked.

Re: Tudor

Posted by Cynthia on November 21, 2025, 8:29 am, in reply to "Tudor"

How did Bazaar even agree to this drivel? For public release? No amount of money could be worth it.

This message is locked.

Re: Tudor

Posted by Hollie24 on November 21, 2025, 11:12 am, in reply to "Re: Tudor"

The article is as God-awful as the photoshoot. Even worse, maybe. Twerkette is doing Balenciaga and the other fashion brands in the shoot no favors. Why she insists on black and white photos is beyon.d me. Are they easier to Photoshop than color? Does she think she looks better in black and white? Does she think it's sophisticated? It's all bizarre Bazaar

This message is locked.

Megalomaniac Meghan Markle

Posted by Hollie24 on November 21, 2025, 3:23 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

A long one, but a good one. Twerkette apparently has people who announce her before her visits.

This message is locked.

Taz: Bazaar photoshoot

Posted by Hollie24 on November 21, 2025, 7:26 pm, in reply to "Megalomaniac Meghan Markle"

Taz thinks--with reason--that those ugly photos are all about Twerkette cosplaying Diana. I can see it.

This message is locked.

The Dress - Narcissists and Stealing

Posted by Hollie24 on November 22, 2025, 10:37 am, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

I have no problem believing Twerkette kept the gown. We know she's stolen other things.

This message is locked.

Re: The Dress - Narcissists and Stealing

Posted by Martha on November 22, 2025, 11:31 pm, in reply to "The Dress - Narcissists and Stealing"

A lot of stars keep shoes and clothing that was loaned to them, so I suppose Meghan thought she was entitled to do the same. But it's just theft. Designers and boutiques don't want the fuss and bad press of trying to get things back. The dress is lovely, but Meghan really should have paid for it if she wanted to keep it. Do we know of royal ladies that keep things that don't belong to them? I know the late Queen Mary was known for appropriating things she took a fancy to, but I don't think that's done anymore.

===

This message is locked.

Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits

Posted by Martha on November 26, 2025, 2:28 pm, in reply to "The Dress - Narcissists and Stealing"

Well, well, well. This goes back to her Suits days when she was doing promos for Reitman's.

===

This message is locked.

Re: Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits

Posted by Hollie24 on November 26, 2025, 2:42 pm, in reply to "Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits"

I remain convinced Twerkette's team sent invoices to Charles's office for clothing that were just loaners and receipts for clothing she then returned. I have no problem believing she thinks she's entitled to the clothes that aren't hers and the money she cheated out of her father-in-law. Narcissists always believe they are entitled to everything they want.

This message is locked.

Re: Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits

Posted by karenl on November 26, 2025, 7:55 pm, in reply to "Re: Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits"

Absolutely, it's entitlement. When Meghan has been challenged over her thievery, she hollers "racism and she's being picked on". She should have been arrested and prosecuted for theft, a long time ago, really, Reitman's should have dropped the ball on her.
If we had done the same, we would have been prosecuted. The woman has no sense of moral "right" and doesn't care..."she's entitled." Tom Sr. dropped the ball on this parenting step, big time.

This message is locked.

Re: Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits

Posted by Hollie24 on November 26, 2025, 10:49 pm, in reply to "Re: Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits"

Tom, Doria, and Twerkette are all narcissists. I hope Lili and Archie can break the cycle, but the reality is they'll probably be as messed up as their parents are.

Twerkette is already blaming everyone else for this latest fiasco. She is an idiot.

This message is locked.

Re: Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits

Posted by karenl on November 27, 2025, 2:23 am, in reply to "Re: Blocked by Dior and most stylists due to commandeering outfits"

Of course Meghan blames everyone and anyone, she's perfect. Everyone else besides her is flawed. We'll see how long her love affair with Balenciaga lasts. I'm sure she's purloined a number of their clothes and accessories so far. However, with there clothes being so hideous now, they fit Meghan personality to a Tee.

This message is locked.

Meghan's Mug

Posted by Hollie24 on November 24, 2025, 1:07 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

Oh my dear word. She's going to produce mugs featuring Archie and Lili's theoretical "letter to Santa." That's my educated guess.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DoY79Ip0GRA

This message is locked.

Twerkette sees Highgrove Company as her nemesis

Posted by Hollie24 on November 24, 2025, 7:57 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

I did not go down a rabbit hole with this one, but I have seen it mentioned several times that Twerkette sees Highgrove as her main competitor and its launch date for its seasonal Christmas range as a direct and intentional slap at her "As Ever" brand. I'm just going to present the two sites here. As ever, Twerkette is delusional, and I've spotted a few things I'd love to get for Christmas.
https://www.highgrovegardens.com/collections/food-drink?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Loom+%7C+PMax+%7C+Alcohol&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21549874234&gbraid=0AAAAADfIXlFdF5QQ8sXZ2uIW71Jpi_Oe4&gclid=Cj0KCQiAoZDJBhC0ARIsAERP-F-TBuf3IGis6Sbxz9ZBJXjAl6Z3UxRMullvvOH80jxZ_oIOQz1S_PQaAj04EALw_wcB
https://asever.com/collections/shop-all

This message is locked.

Re: Twerkette sees Highgrove Company as her nemesis

Posted by Martha on November 25, 2025, 11:14 am, in reply to "Twerkette sees Highgrove Company as her nemesis"

I'll give Meghan this - she has expanded her range and one could create a gift basket using her offerings. But as glossy and professional as the photos are, none of it is inviting. Maybe it's the spikey calligraphy, but even if one didn't know it was Meghan's one would pass it by in a store. If you're a Meghan fan, then you'll fall over it and buy honey and tea to go with the flower sprinkles you bought at the last go-round. Otherwise, meh.

In comparison to the Highgrove range, it's more inviting and they have shortbread cookies which is all one needs to be happy. The Highgrove packaging says, "We know what we're doing here" and one can have confidence that it will all be delicious.

===

This message is locked.

And she's slammed again

Posted by Martha on November 25, 2025, 11:24 am, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

I agree with her about offering children healthy, elevated versions of food. But a child will tip over a stemmed parfait bowl. Why not put it in a simple juice glass that they can hold with one hand and use a spoon with the other?

Meghan Markle has been criticized for touting a dish as kid-friendly after horrified viewers noted it could result in catastrophic injuries.

In a video uploaded to her As Ever Instagram page, the Duchess of Sussex, 44, was preparing a lavish-looking breakfast station when she made the blunder.

Her offerings included a yogurt parfait, which she presented beautifully in a vintage-looking coupe glass, assembling the dish with some As Ever jam, yogurt, fruit and a drizzle of her As Ever honey.

'You could do a yogurt parfait in a normal bowl, or you could just make it a little bit more special,' she suggested in the clip as she showcased the delicate coups.

She then added, 'All of this is great for kids.'

But some viewers were left horrified at the thought of giving children a delicate vessel that could smash and result in injuries to anyone near it.

Taking to X, formerly Twitter, to share their thoughts, one wrote: 'Look, I'm not a duchess, but I would not put children's yogurt parfaits in delicate, breakable glasses unless you have a masochistic need to step on crystal shards.

'Maybe for a ladies' luncheon but not the primary school set,' another added.

'I like that she's cooking in a white shirt. My small children would use it as a canvas,' joked someone else.

A fourth person wrote: 'She's not a real human. I'm skeptical that she even parents her own children at this point.'

Someone else recommended the duchess use 'Tupperware or similar soft plastic' to avoid breakages.

'It's funny because she's trying to be relatable, but absolutely no one lives like this,' wrote another.

The dangers of broken glass go beyond surface cuts, according to the Cleveland Clinic, which specifies if untreated, glass wounds can lead to infection.

'Only attempt to remove a piece of glass if you can clearly see it,' urgent care physician Allan Capin said.

'Digging for a shard you can't see might push it farther into your foot and make your injury worse.'

It's not the first time the mom of Archie, six, and Lilibet, four, has been ridiculed for making claims about child-appropriate ideas.

Parents were horrified earlier in the year after an episode of With Love, Meghan, for her children's birthday party suggestions, calling them 'over the top' and 'extremely time-consuming'.

The Suits actress suggested giving out party bags that included seeds, mini gardening tools, sugar snap peas, and sweet basil, along with manuka honey sticks, instead of candy.

Last week, the Duchess of Sussex sent out a cryptic message to her As Ever customers - as she teased that 'something big' was coming ahead of the holidays.

Earlier this month, Meghan released an As Ever holiday drop, introducing a new range of products to the line.

The drop included two scented candles that each retailed for $64, a $16 hot toddy and apple cider spice mulling kit, and a special sage honey with honeycomb in it for $32.

The announcement came after Meghan had graced the cover of Harper's Bazaar magazine's December 2025/January 2026 edition, which was labeled as the art issue.

She appeared to be wearing no makeup in the cover photo, and she had her hair tied back, showing off a pair of dangling diamond earrings.

The mom-of-two wore a low-cut, black silk blazer with a tie at the waist, as the magazine's cover was titled, 'Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Meets her Moment.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-15322379/meghan-markle-slammed-kitchen-blunder-asever-jam.html

===

This message is locked.

Re: And she's slammed again

Posted by Hollie24 on November 25, 2025, 5:04 pm, in reply to "And she's slammed again"

She's telling people that, if they have company for breakfast, you can set up a "create your own yogurt parfait" station. It won't be only the children smashing things. Adults would too. It's a stupid idea all around.

In another clip I saw, she also recommended buying frozen pancakes to serve your guests. Sorry, but what? Pancakes are easy to make from scratch. Now we know what Twerkette's kids eat.

This message is locked.

10 Takeaways From Soho Wh**ing

Posted by Hollie24 on November 27, 2025, 2:54 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

Look who's hawking "her" stuff at SoHo House. Tudor has something to say about it.

This message is locked.

Duchess Sticky Fingers

Posted by Hollie24 on November 28, 2025, 12:14 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

Taz. William just gets stuck in, no fuss or bother. He just gets on with it and works hard.

Twerkette seems to have thought a charity visit would make her look good. Nope, she just looked stupid. And she's been "borrowing" for more than a decade. Sure, a lot of actors get some clothes or props from the shows and movies they do, but the kind of loot Twerkette demanded or just walked off with usually goes to someone like Reese Witherspoon or Anne Hathaway, not some no-talent supporting cast member.

This message is locked.

Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers

Posted by Cynthia on November 28, 2025, 12:17 pm, in reply to "Duchess Sticky Fingers"

The providers know that someone like Reese or Anne would provide POSITIVE publicity, too!

This message is locked.

Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers

Posted by Hollie24 on November 28, 2025, 1:32 pm, in reply to "Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers"

Yep. Reese got the Chanel suit she wore in Legally Blonde, while both Anne Hathaway and Emily Blunt got some goodies from The Devil Wears Prada. All of those actresses are intelligent, talented, and hardworking. And the clothes look good on them.

This message is locked.

Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers

Posted by Martha on November 28, 2025, 2:54 pm, in reply to "Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers"

Now we know why her clothes weren't altered to fit - they were supposed to be going back.

===

This message is locked.

Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers

Posted by Hollie24 on November 28, 2025, 8:14 pm, in reply to "Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers"

Yep. We all had our suspicions, and now we have confirmation.

This message is locked.

Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers

Posted by karenl on November 28, 2025, 8:27 pm, in reply to "Re: Duchess Sticky Fingers"

I wish I could find the video, there was a video of Markle and another actress from Suits being interviewed by a reporter. The reporter asks both women if they were ever tempted to keep the fabulous clothes they wore on Suits. Meghan pipes up and states that she loved the Burberry coat and took it home and she "has several pieces" at home. Both the reporter and the actress look at Meghan with horror. The reported then starts talking to the other actress and Meghan is completely ignored.
I'm sure some outfits we seen Meghan wear in the past especially before marrying Dimwit were from Suits.

This message is locked.

Salmonella Sussex

Posted by Hollie24 on November 28, 2025, 5:17 pm, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

Twerkette has a new nickname. She keeps unwrapped raw chicken directly on a fridge shelf. She never washes her hands before or during cooking. And she rubbed something all over a raw turkey, inside and out, with her bare hands. Plus her hair is down in the food all the time and she wears all her rings and bracelets while "cooking."

This message is locked.

Re: Salmonella Sussex - cancelled

Posted by Martha on November 29, 2025, 9:07 am, in reply to "Salmonella Sussex"

The blow-back on the many food handling violations was so harsh that Netflix pulled the plug.

===

This message is locked.

THIS Shows They Are In Trouble

Posted by Hollie24 on November 29, 2025, 4:38 am, in reply to "November 19 - twerking royals"

Salmonella and H paid--naturally using other people's money--to do a corporate session with a charity. $3000 from Archewell.

This message is locked.

« Back to index

171

[ Royal News and Views ]