Royal News and Views

She can reinvent herself every day, but it still won't work. She's lazy, untalented, and she has to steal other people's ideas/creations because she lacks imagination.
In the photos, none of the other women are even looking at her, they're all talking to other people. Meghan probably pressured the hostess to "invite" her. She's getting more and more desperate.

This message is locked.

DS tote bag?

Posted by Susan T on October 17, 2025, 10:11 am, in reply to "October 17 - twerking royals"

Darn Stupid?

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: DS tote bag?

Posted by Martha on October 17, 2025, 10:18 am, in reply to "DS tote bag?"

Wow, that's gaudy! I was expecting gold calligraphy on a black bag, but I'd turn it inside out before being seen carrying THAT.

===

This message is locked.

Re: DS tote bag?

Posted by Hollie24 on October 17, 2025, 11:06 am, in reply to "DS tote bag?"

Distinctly Skanky?

That is one loud and tacky bag. Don't get me wrong, I love tacky things, like plastic pink flamingos wearing Santa Claus hats and Dolly Parton (Dolly herself says she's tacky, and I adore her) , but there's tacky and then there's tacky. Twerkette's bag is the ugly tacky.

This message is locked.

Re: DS tote bag?

Posted by karenl on October 17, 2025, 7:29 pm, in reply to "Re: DS tote bag?"

It's not only ugly, but it looks flimsy and cheap. I've seen cuter and even classier totes at the Dollar Tree...I bought one for the summer and got compliments.

This message is locked.

It's not the hag's bag

Posted by Martha on October 17, 2025, 8:11 pm, in reply to "Re: DS tote bag?"

Whether it's ugly or not really isn't the question. The Sussexes had an agreement with the late queen not to monetize, market or commercialize Harry's royal heritage and they've reneged on the agreement at every turn. Is this Meghan thumbing her nose at the late monarch yet again or is that the logo of a company unrelated Sussexland? If that bag is a prototype of MeghanMerch, it's another strike against them. I doubt Harry brought it up to Charles for his approval during their tea. Charles may wait until the last months of his reign to strip them of their titles, but I don't think he wants that action to be part of his legacy. They won't go down without a fight, and Charles doesn't want a familial brawl that will gin up yet more uncomfortable headlines.

William will have no problem being ruthless in dealing with his brother, and the precedent has been set for a king to force an errant brother to the hinterlands. I don't think he's afraid of what the Sussexes will do or say.

===

This message is locked.

Re: It's not the hag's bag

Posted by karenl on October 17, 2025, 9:32 pm, in reply to "It's not the hag's bag"

Oh, sure it's Meghan flipping off the Monarchy and the Royal Family with Harry cheering her on. We know Harry didn't bring it up at his meet and greet with Pa, he probably was too concerned about trying to get money from the King plus the big prize, his tax payer security and IPP status.
I'm sure Charles doesn't want to do an "Andrew" on the Sussexes because it would be his legacy, but if he did, he would have the UK public behind him even though the press would be up in arms and crying foul. I agree William won't hesitate and the press be damned.
One thing I just learned is the newspapers in the UK are publishing excerpts from Virginia's book....most notably excerpts about Andrew. That was the final straw.....and Virginia got the last laugh, whether the narrative about Andrew is true or not.

This message is locked.

Re: It's not the hag's bag

Posted by karenl on October 17, 2025, 9:33 pm, in reply to "Re: It's not the hag's bag"

I apologize, the part concerning Andrew, I meant to put in the thread about Andrew and Fergie. I got carried away.

This message is locked.

Re: It's not the hag's bag

Posted by Hollie24 on October 17, 2025, 10:28 pm, in reply to "Re: It's not the hag's bag"

At least you didn't accidentally post a video about dogs on a pup bus!

This message is locked.

Re: It's not the hag's bag

Posted by karenl on October 18, 2025, 8:04 pm, in reply to "Re: It's not the hag's bag"

That was a great "oops", I loved it.

This message is locked.

Twerkette attends power dinner for women

Posted by Hollie24 on October 17, 2025, 11:56 am, in reply to "October 17 - twerking royals"

She boasts about providing the wine for the dinner. Had to get a plug in! Twerkette's suit is ugly and why she persists in pushing the sleeves up I don't know. I'd like to know how much she paid to be included.

https://www.instyle.com/meghan-markle-tan-pantsuit-seat-at-the-table-dinner-11831713

This message is locked.

Unforgettable Evening...Except Meghan`s Wine!

Posted by Hollie24 on October 17, 2025, 12:10 pm, in reply to "Twerkette attends power dinner for women"

A great Tudorial.

This message is locked.

Oops!

Posted by Hollie24 on October 17, 2025, 12:12 pm, in reply to "Unforgettable Evening...Except Meghan`s Wine! "

I love K9 Konvoy, but I meant to post the Tudorial. I hope y'all enjoy the pups, and here's the correct link!

This message is locked.

How Inept And Stupid Are You Meghan?

Posted by karenl on October 22, 2025, 9:54 pm, in reply to "Oops!"

I missed this tidbit, my sister sent the link. She knew how much we helped our grandmother with canning and making jams.
The rubber part of the tongs go around the hot jar necks....it shows again how Meghan doesn't do any of the actual cooking/baking...it's all the staff with Netflix. This is a great example.

https://www.delish.com/food-news/a69000329/meghan-markle-jam-mistake-reaction/

This message is locked.