Re: Burna
Posted by susieQ on August 19, 2025, 2:35 pm, in reply to "
Re: Burna"
User logged in as susieQ
To be fair (sort of) the letter doesn't state that his grandfather saw action in the Burma campaign, just in the 'Pacific campaign." But even that is wildly misleading as he wasn't involved in any fighting there I don't think. The letter was word salad and a very foolish stunt IMHO.
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- Aug 18 - the twerking royals - Susan T August 18, 2025, 8:50 am
- Secret tribute to Prince Philip - Susan T August 18, 2025, 9:25 am
- Re: Secret tribute to Prince Philip - Cynthia August 18, 2025, 10:44 am
- Re: Secret tribute to Prince Philip - Hollie24 August 18, 2025, 12:16 pm
- Burna - Karen August 18, 2025, 3:05 pm
- Re: Burna - Hollie24 August 18, 2025, 3:23 pm
- Re: Burna - Susan T August 18, 2025, 4:16 pm
- Re: Burna - Hollie24 August 18, 2025, 5:41 pm
- Re: Burna - Susan T August 19, 2025, 1:22 am
- Re: Burna - Hollie24 August 19, 2025, 2:35 am
- Re: Burna - susieQ August 19, 2025, 2:35 pm
- A great Tudorial - Hollie24 August 18, 2025, 1:36 pm
- TRAITOR PRINCE - He Doesn't Even Deserve The Same Title - Hollie24 August 20, 2025, 4:51 pm
- Giggles - Hollie24 August 22, 2025, 1:53 am
- RHR Jen - Hollie24 August 23, 2025, 4:04 pm
- Pasta as a metaphor - Hollie24 August 23, 2025, 7:17 pm
- SILLY SEASON - One Brother Serves, The Other Surfs - Hollie24 August 24, 2025, 4:32 pm
- PS - Hollie24 August 24, 2025, 4:46 pm
- Re: PS - stephen August 24, 2025, 8:32 pm
 « Back to index | View thread » |