dude, I guess you are accepting of the CSU Chancelor's office appointing a 67 year old crony 10 years ago, then she leeches on the CSU sysstem for 10 years, disappears her last 3 or so years in her Position.
I think I have a pretty good idea of concrete accomplishments and leadershp, you can disagree.
I just dare you to be specific. "Jane made this decision and this was the result, due to this"
go ahead, be specific, and if you bring up the $310 million, you better be prepared to list the break down of what was actual funds and new donors and concrete donors, and how much of that was just normal funding expected and in the course of her position . because I guarantee you if she actually 'raised' $310 million, the Beach endowment would have rocketed up....and it HAS NOT. so go ahead, be specific. lol, $310 mil in 18 months, and she terminated it early because? uh, why would anyone terminate a successful fund-raising program?!. pure BULL-SH&T!!! 
Previous Message
You have no basis in reality on accomplishments. Previous Message
she should show some respect and resign for doing NOTHING of value over 10 years but pad her pension
the ultimate irony, Jane is the ultimate 'White Privilege' beneficiary.
would be funny, but it's too sad.
77 years old and just hung around and accomplished squat, and LIED about raising $310 million, total BS number Previous Message
The Prez will help in the transition for the new person. Previous Message
The Chancellor’s Office website has always stated that the announcement would be made at the July Trustees meeting, so it’s not a rumor, and there is no reason to believe anything is amiss. Appointing an interim is nothing to worry about either. We just have to hope that the process found some candidates who will be up to the job. Previous Message
It's rather odd that we haven't heard any formal or informal news about Jane's replacement. Jane's last day is June 30, exactly 3 weeks away. There was speculation that her replacement would be named during the CSU Board of Trustees meeting scheduled for July 20-23. But, that would require them appointing an interim (albeit a short term) president. They would have done that by now if that was the case. Another more likely scenario is that the CSU will announce her successor soon (like this week) and the person will be local, as in either the current provost or someone local who could assume the duties on July 1. It won't be someone from afar because that person couldn't take over the reigns on July 1st either. This doesn't sound promising...
53
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index
on 6/11/2025, 9:02 am, in reply to "