I think we only differing on terminology.

What you are talking about (in my opinion) is a misapplication of the rule. You called a quick takedown, and when questioned on it, you realized he didn't have control beyond reaction time so your call was a misapplication of the rules and easily correctable. No change in your judgement (what you saw), only a change in how you applied the rule to it. If on the other hand your judgement (what you saw) was that he DID have control beyond reaction time (even though he didn't), would you change what you thought you saw(your judgement)?

Judgement is what you think you saw. It is what it is. Mis-application of the rule is when you saw it correctly but misapplied the rule. Do you see the difference there?