I don't know that the rankings are that updated. Just looking at few of the top kids at 106 and 113 alone from 1A several of those kids have been wrestling at 132, 126, 120 yet ranked at 106 and 113. It looks as if rankings were developed from taking out the seniors from last years mat classic and moving up the other placers, participants, alternates etc. If fans want to come on the site to gather a fair assessment of the pecking order, their should be a little more research and effort put into it. I appreciate your willingness to volunteer as a ranker but a more thorough job needs to be done.
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »