Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

June 1 - them

Posted by Susan T on June 1, 2026, 8:36 am

n/t

This message is locked.

2016 - 'There are no $100 candles on my site - that's so obnoxious'

Posted by Susan T on June 1, 2026, 8:38 am, in reply to "June 1 - them"

What a difference a decade makes.

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: 2016 - 'There are no $100 candles on my site - that's so obnoxious'

Posted by Hollie24 on June 1, 2026, 4:09 pm, in reply to "2016 - 'There are no $100 candles on my site - that's so obnoxious'"

She babbles on about her "ethos." Well, we all know what her "ethose" is: lies; ghosting people; lies; a complete inability to act and dress appropriately; lies; rewriting history; and lies.

This message is locked.

Re: 2016 - 'There are no $100 candles on my site - that's so obnoxious'

Posted by karenl on June 2, 2026, 2:38 am, in reply to "Re: 2016 - 'There are no $100 candles on my site - that's so obnoxious'"

For crying out loud, $256 for four candles..what a joke. They probably don't have wicks, as usual. What are "luxury matches"? A match is a match...they probably are the ones that don't ignite even if you strike them for 4-5 times and then break.
There aren't going to be a flood of orders for any of her junk. Poor quality and people are more concerned about filling up their vehicles and buying food right now.

This message is locked.

Re: 2016 - 'There are no $100 candles on my site - that's so obnoxious'

Posted by Hollie24 on June 2, 2026, 3:48 am, in reply to "Re: 2016 - 'There are no $100 candles on my site - that's so obnoxious'"

I just want things on there that you can have. And I want people who understand that ethos.

'I've always crafted it [The Tig] as "aspirational girl next door", like, you can aspire for it but totally attain it too.'

I got completely lost with that first sentence. What does it mean? The second sentence is even worse.

Her makeup was bad--she must have applied those false lashes herself, and shimmery eye makeup is not her friend. She's addressing an audience in ripped jeans, lots of bracelets, and flopped hair. No bronzer, I see, or at least very little. And she mentions that she's looking for someone to help her manage her website. The more things change...

This message is locked.

Obnoxious

Posted by Hollie24 on June 4, 2026, 3:34 pm, in reply to "June 1 - them"

Taz.Some good stuff.

This message is locked.

Two new photos for Lili's birthday

Posted by Hollie24 on June 4, 2026, 3:49 pm, in reply to "June 1 - them"

The best I can say about these photos is at least Lili's hair has been combed. In the photo with both parental units, it's clear the maternal unit wants the focus to be on Herself, although She looks like Her wig has slipped and Lili is kicking Her . In the second photo, Lili, alone and barefoot, is gently touching a flower. Where are the balloons, the cake, the horde of children running around and playing games before cake and presents? Where is the joy?

How can anyone think this is normal? It's not normal. It will never be normal.

https://people.com/meghan-markle-celebrates-daughter-princess-lilibet-5th-birthday-11990307

This message is locked.

Crimes Against Fashion and Food

Posted by Hollie24 on June 12, 2026, 11:46 am, in reply to "June 1 - them"

Taz. She covers Her photo dump as well as what the RF is doing.

This message is locked.

She is using other people's babies and other people tragedies to promote herself

Posted by Hollie24 on June 12, 2026, 8:44 pm, in reply to "June 1 - them"

She still doesn't know how to hold a baby. And where is her bestie, the baby's mother, in the photo? It looks like she's cosplaying a caring mother. What decent person pulls this?

Link: Supine Publication

This message is locked.

Re: She is using other people's babies and other people tragedies to promote herself

Posted by karenl on June 13, 2026, 10:41 pm, in reply to "She is using other people's babies and other people tragedies to promote herself"

No, Meghan doesn't know how to hold a baby and that definitely not a newborn. Yeah, why is Jack's mother not in the photo? Meghan, holding Jack and kissing him? Oh no....she's kissing that baby like he's her baby, I've never kissed a friend's baby nor babies in the family unless I'm given the go-ahead. To me, that's crossing a line. Meghan and Kelly are that close of friends...Oh, the crass statement about Jack not being "Harry's", absolutely out of line and not in the least funny.
If I was Kelly, I would kick Meghan to the curb after this behavior. It was all uncalled for.

This message is locked.

Royal Sunshine

Posted by Hollie24 on June 19, 2026, 5:35 pm, in reply to "June 1 - them"

I need a plushy key chain now.

This message is locked.

Supine Publication

Posted by Hollie24 on June 19, 2026, 9:30 pm, in reply to "June 1 - them"

Do we believe this? Or is this another "put a story out there and see if it comes true" bit of nonsense? What Royal estate is near the Invictus Games sites? They are using their kids to get through to Charles, which is despicable.

Link: Supine Publication

This message is locked.

Re: Supine Publication

Posted by Martha on June 19, 2026, 10:23 pm, in reply to "Supine Publication"

If they've "yet to accept the offer" that means SHE'S dragging her feet. Harry wants to go and bring the children, Meghan is holding out for something more.

===

This message is locked.

Re: June 1 - them

Posted by Nellie on June 20, 2026, 12:16 am, in reply to "June 1 - them"

I will never believe the three are coming to UK until I see it.

This message is locked.

Re: June 1 - them

Posted by Arlene on June 20, 2026, 8:51 am, in reply to "Re: June 1 - them"

I'm with you, Nellie. I think at the last minute Meghan will come up with an excuse not to go. I think all the talk was to take away from what the Royals were doing last week. It worked to an extent. But now what do they do?

This message is locked.

Re: June 1 - them

Posted by karenl on June 20, 2026, 10:43 pm, in reply to "Re: June 1 - them"

This past week the Express was gushing about Harry and Meghan will be given "one of the Royal palaces to stay at while in the UK".....no way. They also ran an exclusive story that Charles would meet Harry, Meghan and the kids in a very private meeting....Charles only. Camilla wouldn't allow that, nor any of the family. It all sounds like the Sussex PR staff or Sunshine Sachs in overdrive. They have to put out something due to the Trooping, Garter Ceremony and Ascot.
In addition, it's summer and the press has to start with the "will they or won't they be invited to Balmoral" blah blah. If the Sussex family travels to the UK, it's a private visit, so they have to bring their security with them. The Govt. won't protect them. I don't believe it.

This message is locked.

Re: June 1 - them

Posted by Cynthia on June 21, 2026, 11:50 am, in reply to "Re: June 1 - them"

Well, the Tower of London is a royal residence...

It was where the monarch stayed the night before his or her coronation, in Medieval days, before St. James's, before Buckingham Palace, before Kensington.

This message is locked.

Re: June 1 - them

Posted by Martha on June 21, 2026, 12:08 pm, in reply to "Re: June 1 - them"

That's a solid alternative.

===

This message is locked.

Sussexes are off the FIFA VIP list

Posted by Martha on June 20, 2026, 12:52 pm, in reply to "June 1 - them"

The old feud with the Beckhams has come back to bite Them on their scrawny arses. Now, They can buy tickets (if any are available) and possibly wrangle themselves into a VIP box at one of the stadiums. But when it comes to the kind of royal access they've been accustomed to, they are shut out. Especially for the final in July. They might use the trip to see Charles as their excuse for not attending the final. Assuming they do go to see his father.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/prince-harry-fifa-world-cup-final-beckham-factor-1802280

https://www.skynews.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity-life/isnt-about-room-on-the-guest-list-why-insiders-say-david-beckham-is-behind-prince-harrys-shock-fifa-world-cup-final-snub/news-story/9fb2d34a474c29bb414e1db3adb0c637

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/celebrity/articles/prince-harry-excluded-fifa-world-164039606.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIBfUgWHvc-K5zxEUKmEIEAGpz_9WUpA7xQolNTYjXEayLSmmkLGA1EoxnziPR9DBFYLECSQ71746KLbHCvPumKvac_XgUpxIdKQwTJx6kNgeH3uypoTuovwu_Umok3aOoGuiaaCX03g2I8SmgwZ0V-GAludCXyaKZ4-TRBGQk4i

===

This message is locked.

Re: Sussexes are off the FIFA VIP list

Posted by Hollie24 on June 20, 2026, 3:28 pm, in reply to "Sussexes are off the FIFA VIP list"

Why is He shocked at not getting a freebie seat ? He's not a working Royal, he's not a good kind of celebrity, and he's not involved in any soccer/football charities or organizations. This sugar-adjacent author is blaming David Beckham, and yes, he might be part of the reason He is sobbing to the media, but I suspect the main reason is that He has devolved into a useless and ridiculous figure of a nobody and His wife is even worse.

This message is locked.

Re: Sussexes are off the FIFA VIP list

Posted by Martha on June 20, 2026, 4:04 pm, in reply to "Re: Sussexes are off the FIFA VIP list"

There are plenty of useless celebrities and influencers who are scoring tickets and getting into the good parties. But they weren't stupid enough to make an enemy of a soccer god. Beckham chose his side, and Harry isn't on it.

===

This message is locked.

Re: Sussexes are off the FIFA VIP list

Posted by karenl on June 20, 2026, 10:46 pm, in reply to "Re: Sussexes are off the FIFA VIP list"

Absolutely. If Harry has his knickers in a knot, he can look to Meghan. She was the one that started the trouble by falsely accusing Victoria Beckham of leaking info, which she didn't do. Dimwit Harry then confronts David and demands apologies etc.
Too bad Harry and Meghan, you lit the fire and got burnt as toast.

This message is locked.

Harry's Large Donation To "Children In Need" Did Not Come From His "Personal Wealth"

Posted by karenl on June 21, 2026, 1:45 am, in reply to "Re: Sussexes are off the FIFA VIP list"

https://www.gbnews.com/royal/prince-harry-duke-of-sussex-royal-family-news-2677058274

This message is locked.

Re: Harry's Large Donation To "Children In Need" Did Not Come From His "Personal Wealth"

Posted by Hollie24 on June 21, 2026, 3:29 am, in reply to "Harry's Large Donation To "Children In Need" Did Not Come From His "Personal Wealth""

Are we looking at a misappropriation of funds thing here? Does He have full access to the foundation? Or did He lie through his teeth about the source of the money?

This message is locked.

Re: Harry's Large Donation To "Children In Need" Did Not Come From His "Personal Wealth"

Posted by Cynthia on June 21, 2026, 7:20 am, in reply to "Re: Harry's Large Donation To "Children In Need" Did Not Come From His "Personal Wealth""

He lied. He said it was from his personal funds. Nope.

This message is locked.

Father's Day photo

Posted by Hollie24 on June 21, 2026, 8:36 pm, in reply to "June 1 - them"

Lili looks like she she's been given a hair cut. She also looks like she's being dressed in beige and white. Archie looks like he's being hugged against his will.

Link: Supine Publication

This message is locked.

« Back to index

129

[ Royal News and Views ]