Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

September 14 - twerking royals

Posted by Susan T on September 14, 2025, 6:23 pm

n/t

This message is locked.

Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'

Posted by Susan T on September 14, 2025, 6:26 pm, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

During a sit-down interview with The Guardian in Kyiv, he said: 'I know that [speaking out] annoys some people and it goes against the narrative.

'The book? It was a series of corrections to stories already out there. One point of view had been put out and it needed to be corrected.'

He added: 'I don't believe that I aired my dirty laundry in public. It was a difficult message, but I did it in the best way possible. My conscience is clear.'

'It is not about revenge, it is about accountability,' he says.

Harry also revealed the words of wisdom his wife, Meghan, gave him were to 'just stick to the truth'.

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'

Posted by Martha on September 14, 2025, 8:38 pm, in reply to "Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'"

I hope Charles is paying attention. Harry is blabbing again and will never shut up.

===

This message is locked.

Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'

Posted by Hollie24 on September 14, 2025, 11:35 pm, in reply to "Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'"

TOW wouldn't know the truth if it came up and whupped her upside the head. She meant "stick to what I've convinced you is the truth."

This message is locked.

Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'

Posted by karenl on September 15, 2025, 12:20 am, in reply to "Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'"

But, But......it wasn't dirty laundry...it was the truth..Harry's truth and nothing, but Harry's truth.

So Harry is blabbing and rehashing his grievances with his family, it means the "tea" didn't go well and he didn't get anything he wanted from Pa.
It's the old MO, "You give us what we want or we go on telling the media how bad we're being treated."

This message is locked.

Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'

Posted by Hollie24 on September 15, 2025, 2:00 am, in reply to "Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'"

Nah, it's the old "you give us what we want and we'll promise not to bibble to the media and then go ahead and babble anyway."

This message is locked.

Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'

Posted by Susan T on September 15, 2025, 9:13 am, in reply to "Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'"

"It was a series of corrections to stories already there."

Because the public really needed to know that, when children, his older-by-two-years brother was given one more sausage than he received. Back in the 1980's, before newspapers were digital, did the British media really was column inches reporting such drivel?

This message is locked.

Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'

Posted by Hollie24 on September 15, 2025, 1:57 pm, in reply to "Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'"

Does Harry's stance mean I can dredge up the fact that my own two years older brother was allowed to ride his bike to the store and I wasn't? Can my five years younger brother take me and my older brother to court because my older brother and I were given more food than him and were allowed to stay up later than him? Is "I'm telling Mom" a valid legal defense?

My brothers and I are all grown up now. No childhood tantrums for us.

This message is locked.

Harry's Comments Prove William Was Correct On The Subject Of "Reconciliation"

Posted by karenl on September 15, 2025, 7:33 pm, in reply to "Re: Believes he didn't air his 'dirty laundry in public'"

...plus Harry is a self centered, selfish, entitled dimwit.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2108602/prince-harry-interview-reconciliation-king-health

This message is locked.

Twerkette shares "throwback" photo of Twerk for his birthday

Posted by Hollie24 on September 16, 2025, 4:25 am, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

People Magazine inadvertently showed off Twerkette's bad Photoshopping by posting the original photo of Harry above the one she umm, err, "fixed" and shared. Harry's head suddenly becomes bulbous and he has a lot more hair. Oops!

https://people.com/meghan-markle-shares-smoldering-throwback-prince-harry-41st-birthday-oh-hi-birthday-boy-11807605

This message is locked.

Birthday Devaluation!

Posted by Hollie24 on September 16, 2025, 9:01 pm, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

Good analysis of why Twerkette posted the birthday greeting and photo(shopped).

This message is locked.

Boring--You Must Be Joking

Posted by Hollie24 on September 17, 2025, 11:39 pm, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

Several different stories. No, William and Catherine are not boring. Twerk is not the savior of the monarchy. Twerkette is oh brother. The late Duchess of Kent was wonderful.

This message is locked.

Fuming In Montecito!

Posted by Hollie24 on September 18, 2025, 11:08 am, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

Camilla looks lovely in blue. Catherine looks stunning in gold. Twerkette looks weirdly into a garden urn.

This message is locked.

Blind Rage in Montecito

Posted by Hollie24 on September 19, 2025, 10:44 am, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

This message is locked.

The Twerks show up at benefit

Posted by Hollie24 on September 21, 2025, 10:49 am, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

The same benefit event where Twerkette tried grabbing the microphone three years ago. For "surprise visit," read: she wasn't invited and wasn't wanted, but showed up with paid paps in tow anyway.

Twerkette is merching Carolina Herrera and Ralph Lauren and wearing way too much jewelry. Altogether she's got 25,000+ UKP's worth on various parts of her body, and yet she manages to make it all look cheap, not to mention awful. As usual she is wildly overdressed and inappropriate for the occasion.

Link: Oh Dear Lord

This message is locked.

Re: The Twerks show up at benefit

Posted by Arlene on September 21, 2025, 6:51 pm, in reply to "The Twerks show up at benefit"

Was it my imagination, or is her dress unbuttoned down to her navel? Who is she trying to impress? And she can make any dress look like a sack of potatoes and her hair is getting stringier and stringier. Enough said, although I could go on and on.

This message is locked.

Re: The Twerks show up at benefit

Posted by karenl on September 21, 2025, 7:15 pm, in reply to "Re: The Twerks show up at benefit"

The first three buttons are undone, the fourth button above the belt is stretched to the limit..if it would have popped off, some poor person would have been blinded. The dress is hideous, the fabric is just weird and it's way too small for La Diva.
I'm sure Meghan crashed the party, she wasn't in attendance last year, by request I'm sure. She "surprise attended" this year, it's her way, crash a party you're not wanted at.

This message is locked.

Re: The Twerks show up at benefit

Posted by Hollie24 on September 22, 2025, 1:10 am, in reply to "Re: The Twerks show up at benefit"

Carolina Herrera has some gorgeous dresses in her Autumn lineup, but this one just doesn't do it for me, not even on the model. On Twerkette it looks awful.

This message is locked.

Re: The Twerks show up at benefit

Posted by Hollie24 on September 21, 2025, 8:16 pm, in reply to "Re: The Twerks show up at benefit"

Yep, the dress was unbuttoned down to there. She flashed quite a bit of inside boobage. Her hair looked really dirty, too. Harry's usual unwashed jeans look was almost as bad.

This message is locked.

Re: The Twerks show up at benefit

Posted by karenl on September 21, 2025, 9:55 pm, in reply to "Re: The Twerks show up at benefit"

Yeah, neither would be a poster child for proper hygiene and neat, clean clothes.

This message is locked.

Re: The Twerks show up at benefit

Posted by Hollie24 on September 22, 2025, 1:15 am, in reply to "Re: The Twerks show up at benefit"

I just noticed the bulging vein on her forehead. Hello, Botox.

This message is locked.

Edward Enninful Won't Feature Meghan In His New Publication

Posted by karenl on September 22, 2025, 7:30 pm, in reply to "Re: The Twerks show up at benefit"

"In a recent interview, Mr Enninful was asked about his vast group of celebrity friends and how rarely he falls out with people.

But he apparently 'paused' when he was asked about the Duchess of Sussex being one of the few exceptions after she guest-edited the September 2019 edition of Vogue.

Asked if she would be his cover star again he said: 'Meghan and I had a great moment with the issue we did, but I feel like I have done it and I wouldn't necessarily repeat myself.'"

He didn't hint at excluding Meghan, he flat out stated it....in a tactful manner. It was apparent when Enninful grew closer to Charles and Camilla over the last few years.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15121767/Ex-Vogue-editor-Edward-Enninful-wont-work-Meghan-Markle.html

This message is locked.

Re: Edward Enninful Won't Feature Meghan In His New Publication

Posted by Hollie24 on September 23, 2025, 1:39 am, in reply to "Edward Enninful Won't Feature Meghan In His New Publication"

Translation: She was hell to work with and I will never make that mistake again.

This message is locked.

Re: Edward Enninful Won't Feature Meghan In His New Publication

Posted by Martha on September 23, 2025, 5:25 pm, in reply to "Edward Enninful Won't Feature Meghan In His New Publication"

If I recall correctly, immediately after the issue was published he distanced himself from Meghan.

===

This message is locked.

SLAPPED DOWN - The Palace Pushed Back !

Posted by Hollie24 on September 23, 2025, 4:42 pm, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

Harry's friend babbles.

This message is locked.

Ooh boy is Twerkette ticked!

Posted by Hollie24 on September 23, 2025, 11:38 pm, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

She really wasn't invited to the Kevin Costner thing. They only invited Harry. It sounds like they gave the organizers a recording announcing them together, but Harry gestured for her to stay off stage while he greeted folks. The moment the mic comes out, though, she's suddenly right by Harry, who actually--gasp--fails to yield to her pawing and clawing, so she walks off again, totally ticked. I wonder if Harry was told by the organizers to keep Meghan away from the mic?

This message is locked.

BANISH THEM - Time To Take Out The Trash, They Have Got To Go!

Posted by Hollie24 on September 25, 2025, 6:19 pm, in reply to "September 14 - twerking royals"

The Yorks and the Twerks have to go.

This message is locked.

Re: BANISH THEM - Time To Take Out The Trash, They Have Got To Go!

Posted by Susan T on September 25, 2025, 7:33 pm, in reply to "BANISH THEM - Time To Take Out The Trash, They Have Got To Go!"

Couple of corrections:

Andrew gave those corgis to the Queen, and they were returned to Andrew after her death. Fergie did her usual and spoke about the corgis as if they were hers.

In the original case against Epstein, he was not convicted. He accepted a plea deal. From wiki:

Epstein agreed to plead guilty in Florida state court to two felony prostitution charges, serve 18 months in prison, register as a sex offender, and pay restitution to three dozen victims identified by the FBI.

This message is locked.

« Back to index

124

[ Royal News and Views ]