Re: "The Sussexes Are Building A Shadow Royal Family, It's Time Someone Asks "Why""
User logged in as jessie
|
I agree 100% with the article and your comments about the article. But I'm not sure even if the king was to remove Harry from the line of succession and as a councillor of State, will do the trick. The issue here is that even if you were to go as far as removing Harry's title, he is still the son of the King. Being the son of the king, means that they will still be pressed attention whatever he does or wherever he goes, and he was still be able to trade on his royal connections.
|
|
Message Thread | This response ↓
- October 11 - them - Susan T October 11, 2026, 12:19 am
- Harry Paid $100K For A "Coping With Grief Masterclass" - karenl October 11, 2026, 1:54 am
- Markle discloses reason for secret London meet-up with Malala Yousafzai - Martha October 11, 2026, 2:28 pm
- The children go for a trudge - Hollie24 October 11, 2026, 3:59 pm
- Taz - Hollie24 October 13, 2026, 10:21 pm
- Re: Taz - karenl October 15, 2026, 2:32 am
- Re: Taz - Cynthia October 15, 2026, 5:37 am
- They visit Nottingham today - Karen October 15, 2026, 8:37 am
- Archewell cuts staff as business faces mounting turbulence - Martha October 16, 2026, 10:01 am
- Harry and Meghan's faux-royal tour in Nottingham exposed why they've really returned - Martha October 19, 2026, 10:13 am
 « Index | View all » |