It occurs to me that any and all papers, records and documents held by BP regarding Andrew can be subpoenaed. This would mean anything mentioning Andrew could be examined for any evidence of him leaking information. If there's anything that shows the the late queen, Philip or Charles *knew* about illegal activities then that could be a huge problem. More than a problem, it would show a cover-up because the information would have been kept in-house for years and not turned over for prosecution, or at least investigation.

The same with whether or not Charles contributed to the Guiffre fund. That could be interpreted as hush money to make the embarrassment go away so as not to mar the Jubilee. I think it will be years before the tentacles are unwound and this is over.

===