"Can it really be the case that the terminally petulant Prince Harry has helped torpedo the charity set up in honour of his mother to help child Aids victims — because the boss of it refused to publicly defend Meghan? It’s unthinkable that this could be the case and yet it’s what Dr Sophie Chandauka, the charity’s boss is alleging. She says Harry — via his team — had asked her to issue “some sort of statement” in support of Meghan to quash rumours of tension between them.
She refused after which Dr Chandauka claims Harry sent her an “unpleasant and imperious note” demanding she “explain herself” after refusing to defend his wife. The charity has already confirmed the existence of this note. However a spokesman says: “We do not have consent to share the communication.”
I have to agree with the author of the article, Harry has picked on the wrong woman, especially demanding "she explain herself". It's condescending and threatening and a strong woman won't put up with such language. I do think Meghan gets Harry to defend her in public as he has because he takes the flak and criticism that Meghan, the "empowered woman" can't face.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/2035536/prince-harry-sentebale-meghan-markle
195