If she said she did something that most people would find admirable, we wouldn't take her word for it, we'd seek corroboration.
I think everything she says should be treated the same way. She may have made the remark about fake ID because she wanted to appear cool and/or fit in with the people she was speaking to, or she was engaged in one-upmanship (you think you were bad? Well, I did this!).
She frequently contradicts herself, changes her story. It's tempting to seize upon the version that paints her in the worst light and decide that is the truth and everything else is a lie, but that's not intellectually honest.
And just because we think something she claims to have done is reprehensible (and why would she admit to it if it wasn't true?), it doesn't follow that she regards her actions as reprehensible. She may think that what she's claimed to have done is good, or powerful, or her only option, etc and therefore, what she said could just as easily have been yet another lie.
145