Flagrant 2 should be used sparingly, and only in the most egregious of cases, which this clearly was not.
AT had his elbow way above his head, that's unnecessary and then he swings it right into the guy's face.
flagrant 2 has nothing to do with intentions, he clocked the guy unintentionally, the refs can't ignore when a guy has his elbow above his shoulder that results in a direct blow to the face, they look and see that swinging elbow up high, it's gonna be a flagrant 2, that's excessive. they probably could call more flagrant 2s
correct call. and yeah, having AT in there would have made a much different game, and given the implications, it's close to a death knoll for seeding, and big damage to NCAA chances, sucks big time.
still guys got to make plays, and can't give up position in the lane like we did repeatedly. I just wish we'd play Lewis / Hart more vs. Silva last 3 games, I get the less maturity part, but the guy simply can't make a 'strength' play out there.
I concur about the coaches, but it WAS bad officiating. There is no way that was a flagrant 2 foul. That call was total BS, and the ejection of AT had a definite effect on the game.
It was BS, and refs involved should be disciplined. Of course, the wimps in this league will do nothing, and stand by blatant imcompetence.
the AT foul was a flagrant 2
but worse part was repeatedly giving Fullerton position down low, at least try fronting those guys, just inside posts kept Fullerton in the game over and over again
Taylor's a good coach and took advantage of match-ups. we gave their inside guys inside position over and over.
loss is a bummer
not even a 4 seed is certain with this.
have to beat Irvine now to have any shot at a 2 seed
the AT foul was a tough thing
still, after adjusting well, Monson didn't re-adjust, Polynic got schooled over and over inside
84
Message Thread
« Back to index