And how do you plan on seeding other than how WA and OR do it right now? The states base it on post-season results from the previous week and is totally objective as opposed to subject seeding, like the arguing at a seeding meeting. Do you suggest a seeding meeting for every weight group in the tournament? That would be around 95-100 weights for all divisions. How do you suggest they handle the volume for the meeting or do you think they just use the rankings from this site and let'er rip? Have your totally thought this through?

BTW, I do like the idea that Gus originally brought up on this thread.