Region 3 had 27
Region 4 had 21
Region 1 had 12
Region 2 had 10
After wrestling at state top 5
Region 3 had 22
Region 4 had 19
Region 1 had 14
Region 2 had 15
It appears that wrestling sorted it out. Regions 3 and 4 didn't really manhandle anything. It appears that region 2 outperformed the ranker's expectations. While region 3 underperformed.
Really it is no big deal. Ranking any classification is a difficult and time consuming endeavor. I think I would rather be a ref than one of the rankers.
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »