1. No. I would like the meet to end at some point, noone (including the wrestlers ) is excited about a match after the 🥇 finals. Maybe consider for 8man tourneys, not state.
2. Don't care
3. Worth considering. Many athletes are 2-3 sport athletes, but would consider a different 2nd/3rd sport if it was offered
4. No. But maybe don't schedule 3 meets a week most weeks of the season, there- yes looking at you OP.
5.Yes yes yes. Kids do fine with 15 on USA side, many forgo even that by double bracketing.
6/7. I am not a fan of the current WA state method of weight stuff. IDK what oversight changes are needed(input coach?) But changing the growth allowance pattern- (I believe OR does a pound post holidays and a 2nd pound post season?), nonsensical "lockin" requirement (why is the descent plan essentially halted if the wrestler doesn't continue to lose the unrealistic 1.5% body weight per week? Surely a computer system could easily recalibrate the descent plan at a slower rate), etc are worth considering. I suspect many changes would just see many state matches wrestled up a weight class though