Can't we be ambitious AND have a mainly young player overall business plan? Why is it either/or?
Surely having an overall philosophy that could possibly make us some nice money can only be good for our on the field chances?
If the Ricketts/Mansfield incident had never happened the Che Adams money would have set us up for years resulting in a better chance of on the field success.
Win lose or draw next Saturday this has been the best team we have had since the days when we were bankrolled by Paul Millerships benevolence or bankrolled by Chek Whytes imaginary money. Surely that suggests that this model is our best chance of on the field success other than us finding a multi millionaire who wants to chuck money at us.
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index
Responses are not allowed!
Create your own free message board!