Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

September 26 - The twerking royals

Posted by Susan T on September 26, 2025, 7:59 am

n/t

Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by Susan T on September 26, 2025, 8:02 am, in reply to "September 26 - The twerking royals"

They are heading to New York City next month, where they will accept an award for their mental health advocacy, it has been revealed.

Link: Daily Mail

Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by Cynthia on September 26, 2025, 8:52 am, in reply to "Humanitarians of the Year Award"

For "co-producing conversations." What on earth does that mean?!

Just another lump of clear plastic.

Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by Hollie24 on September 26, 2025, 11:18 am, in reply to "Humanitarians of the Year Award"

Twerkette wasn't allowed to speak at the Costner fundraiser, so she decided to buy herself (and Twerk) yet another humanitarian award?

And is "humanitarian" now synonymous with "encourage followers to attack and harass others"? As for helping with mental health, I guess causing people to laugh at their stupidity every day counts!

October 9 is John Lennon's birthday. I suspect more people want to celebrate and honor him than care about the Twerks.

Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by karenl on September 26, 2025, 9:23 pm, in reply to "Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award"

Big flashy website with plenty of photos of Harry and Meghan featured in a photo section. I've never heard of this operation.
Charity Navigator gives it a 65% and only 2 stars, the big negatives are in accountability and finance. I won't be donating.....the Sussexes and the tabloids can splash it all about, but it's a nothing.

https://www.projecthealthyminds.com/

Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by Cynthia on September 27, 2025, 12:58 am, in reply to "Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award"

It's only been around for five years, with only six employees, yet the CEO makes the salary of an outfit with a much larger staff. Their description on the tax return is all word-salad and woo. They even name-drop H&M in the 990!

Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by Hollie24 on September 27, 2025, 1:01 am, in reply to "Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award"

It looks and feels like a vanity charity, one that's set up for rich people to feel good about themselves by donating to it, and which only donates 1 percent to actual causes.

So how much is this group shelling out for the private Twerker jet, the posh Twerker hotel stay, the ginormous Twerker SUVs, and the silly security?

Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by Hollie24 on September 27, 2025, 1:21 am, in reply to "Humanitarians of the Year Award"

I've found the dress Twerkette should wear to the gala thingy. There's no way she could possibly make this dress worse than it already is.
https://www.balenciaga.com/en-us/cocoon-maxi-dress-faded-black-837095TQVV41083.html

Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by Martha on September 27, 2025, 3:15 pm, in reply to "Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award"

That is just sad, especially for the money. But didn't she already wear that in olive green to watch polo when Archie was a baby?

===

Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award

Posted by Hollie24 on September 27, 2025, 9:39 pm, in reply to "Re: Humanitarians of the Year Award"

Oh yes, the green Army tent. That one had a different collar and wasn't full-length, though. The Balenciaga sack thingy can double as blackout curtains when it's not being worn--think the Carol Burnett "Went With The Wind" bit in reverse!

Harry 'taken by surprise' by how 'formal' his 53-minute meeting was with the King

Posted by Martha on September 26, 2025, 11:03 pm, in reply to "September 26 - The twerking royals"

Prince Harry is understood to be 'taken by surprise' by how 'formal' his reunion meeting with his father King Charles proved to be.

During a four-day visit to the UK earlier this month, Harry met Charles, 76, at Clarence House face-to-face for the first time in a year and a half.

The 53-minute meeting was seen as a significant but tentative step towards repairing the troubled relationship between Charles and Harry.

However, the pair's meeting has been revealed to be 'distinctly formal' and there is still no plan for Harry to return to the family fold.

It is reported that Harry was surprised by the formalities and even joked that he felt more like an 'official visitor' rather than a family member.

Royal insiders have described the exchange as being held in a similar style to that of dignitaries and visitors at royal residences.

( ... )

However, there are reportedly no moves for the pair to be seen in public together or for Harry to return for a 'half-in, half-out' hybrid royal role.

It is understood that the King is steadfast in upholding the Sandringham Agreement, made in January 2020, which rejected Harry's bid for a hybrid role.

( ... )

So all the wishful thinking and media leaks didn't make it so. Imagine that.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/royals/article-15138555/Prince-Harry-formal-meeting-King-Charles-Royal-Family-Meghan.html

===

Re: Harry 'taken by surprise' by how 'formal' his 53-minute meeting was with the King

Posted by Hollie24 on September 27, 2025, 1:10 am, in reply to "Harry 'taken by surprise' by how 'formal' his 53-minute meeting was with the King"

Harry's got to be ticked that William has once again spent most of this week up at Balmoral with just Charles. It seems to be a tradition now as Charles has invited William up for a second private visit ever since the Queen passed away. He can only spare an hour--less--for Harry, yet can spent whole days with William. Newsflash, Harry: you're not the one who matters.

Harry slams those ‘sabotaging any reconciliation’ efforts between him and King Charles

Posted by Martha on September 27, 2025, 3:13 pm, in reply to "Re: Harry 'taken by surprise' by how 'formal' his 53-minute meeting was with the King"

He was criticized for leaking details about the visit, so he covers up by slamming the leak? Does he not see how much further along he would have been in he had followed the First Rule?

https://pagesix.com/2025/09/27/royal-family/prince-harry-slams-those-sabotaging-any-reconciliation-efforts-between-him-and-king-charles/?_gl=1*19q28av*_ga*MTI4NTkwMTQzNi4xNzU4MTE0MTQ3*_ga_0DZ7LHF5PZ*czE3NTg5OTk5MjQkbzM0JGcxJHQxNzU5MDAwMTE5JGo0OCRsMCRoMA..

===

Re: Harry slams those ‘sabotaging any reconciliation’ efforts between him and King Charles

Posted by karenl on September 27, 2025, 8:50 pm, in reply to "Harry slams those ‘sabotaging any reconciliation’ efforts between him and King Charles "

You can't claim how formal the meeting was and then come back with your spokesperson stating there were, "hugs and tears".
The meeting didn't go as Harry wanted. Every time he doesn't get his way/the truth of what really went down is revealed, Harry always cries, "Sabotage!"
The media was full of stories of how Harry was going to have an increased role in the Royal Family now and an announcement was soon forthcoming that the King and Harry would be making a very public appearance together! The story also came out that the King, "preferred dealing with Harry and William was so difficult to deal with...according to the King." All from the Sussex PR flunkies, no doubt. The truth always comes out several days after these "meets".

SELF SABOTAGE - Or Is It Really The Men In Grey?

Posted by Hollie24 on September 29, 2025, 7:46 pm, in reply to "September 26 - The twerking royals"

I'm only posting this because I like Taz's new hair look.

« Back to index

[ Royal News and Views ]