Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

March 29 - This One and His Wife

Posted by Susan T on March 28, 2024, 10:25 am

n/t

This message is locked.

Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls

Posted by Susan T on March 28, 2024, 10:29 am, in reply to "March 29 - This One and His Wife"

n/t

Link: The Sun

This message is locked.

Re: Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls

Posted by Martha on March 28, 2024, 12:05 pm, in reply to "Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls"

Are these the grown offspring of the Di-hard Diana fans who were in constant uproar during the 90's and early 00's? I see a familial resemblance around the foaming mouth.

===

This message is locked.

Re: Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls

Posted by Susan T on March 28, 2024, 3:14 pm, in reply to "Re: Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls"

They are really convinced that if they smear William and Catherine enough then the line of succession will be changed so that Harry will become king.

I get a sense of desperation since Charles revealed he has cancer. They are afraid of running out of time before their goal can be achieved.

And that's why no matter what info, photos and videos are provided, they will continue to insist "That's not her!"

This message is locked.

Re: Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls

Posted by Martha on March 28, 2024, 3:43 pm, in reply to "Re: Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls"

I listened to part of a podcast hosted by two sugars, and I was horrified by what I heard. This was not just fandom, this was obsession. They were asking people to contact them to be organized into what I would characterize as "reaction squads". They take these attacks on the Waleses as a life's mission, and they will destroy anyone who gets in their way. There are different strata of "non-believers" that range from low level threat (not a royal watcher and don't care either way) to "must harass to point of destruction" fans of W & C. They were talking about being paid by WME for their services.

What hath the internet wrought?

===

This message is locked.

Re: Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls

Posted by karenl on March 28, 2024, 6:05 pm, in reply to "Re: Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls"

These people are not "fans", they're sociopaths/pyschopathic. I'm not stating this lightly. I agree with Susan when she states they are getting desperate, not only are Harry and Meghan not getting to the Throne, they are getting further and further away from Royalty. The UK public loathes them and the US public, never thrilled or caring, have grown to intensely dislike the Sussexes. The public dislike has only grown more intense after the trolling of the POW.
It has been proven when most of the woke celebs who trolled Catherine, either "apologized" or quietly (and cowardly) withdrew their posts after intense public backlash. The backlash has been huge from all sectors. The people can't stand their idols being shown up as failures or embarrassments as they have been especially in the past year. Now after African Parks, we have Harry embroiled in a lawsuit, which possibly be more than a major embarrassment for him and Meghan as well.
I have to give The Sun credit, they are the only publication which has consistently put the spotlight on the Sussex Squad, other publications have mentioned their tactics in passing, but the majority of the time labeled them as "Loyal fans".

This message is locked.

Taz: Dollar Store Duchess

Posted by karenl on March 29, 2024, 7:48 pm, in reply to "Re: Inside the sinister world of the Sussex Squad online trolls"

This message is locked.

Harry paranoid his family will betray him

Posted by Martha on March 29, 2024, 8:34 pm, in reply to "March 29 - This One and His Wife"

Oh really?

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1883152/prince-harry-paranoid-betrayal-royal-family

===

This message is locked.

Re: Harry paranoid his family will betray him

Posted by Susan T on March 29, 2024, 8:54 pm, in reply to "Harry paranoid his family will betray him"

Quote: "Because Harry is so far away now from the day-to-day lives of the rest of the Royal Family, he's permanently in the state of paranoia about 'The Firm' betraying him or doing things without letting him know or planning things that will make him look bad."

Harry is suffering from a very bad case of projection.

This message is locked.

Re: Harry paranoid his family will betray him

Posted by karenl on March 30, 2024, 12:02 am, in reply to "Re: Harry paranoid his family will betray him"

Pure fantasy/fiction. When did Harry turn down a meeting with William this year? It was the other way around, if a meeting was even suggested to William. What high profile event is going on this summer, that William and Harry are supposed to have their "tense" meeting? Pure fiction.
Interesting, this paranoia suddenly has come to light a couple of days after Harry's name was mentioned in Diddy's lawsuit. I'm just saying.

This message is locked.

Re: Harry paranoid his family will betray him

Posted by Susan T on March 30, 2024, 12:30 am, in reply to "Re: Harry paranoid his family will betray him"

The high-profile event is the wedding of the Duke of Westminster scheduled for June 7. The media have been assuming, since the engagement was announced, that both brothers would be invited.

This message is locked.

Re: Harry paranoid his family will betray him

Posted by karenl on March 30, 2024, 1:27 am, in reply to "Re: Harry paranoid his family will betray him"

Okay, I thought that it was put out that Harry was not invited, but the media has changed it's mind now and is assuming he'll show up. Of course, he has to bring his own security.

This message is locked.

It's a long list

Posted by Martha on March 31, 2024, 7:28 pm, in reply to "March 29 - This One and His Wife"

This does seem like piling on, but there's no lie here. If anything, the list is abridged. The entire Markle family and the Raglands, except for Doria, should also be on the list. As well as her husband's family and his long-time friends with whom she did not build a relationship and had jettisoned from her married life. Not to mention the many staff who've quit, as well as the nannies. This does seem like piling on, but there's no lie here. The common thread is Meghan. The only question is who will be next, because there will be more.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-13218349/meghan-markle-dumped-friends-jessica-mulroney-cory-vitiello.html

===

This message is locked.

Re: It's a long list

Posted by karenl on April 1, 2024, 12:10 am, in reply to "It's a long list"

It's not piling on, it's the truth. We haven't heard from the Make-Up Dude forever, so he must have been Markled. Social climbers don't have close friends or really friends. They see people only as persons/contacts who can propel them up the ladder of status/prestige. Once that happens, then the contacts are considered throw-aways.
I didn't like Jessica Mulroney, she was nasty towards the Royals especially Catherine, no surprise , but I still believe that whole deal with the "influencer" was a set up. For some reason Jessica ticked Meghan off and Jessica was set up to be humiliated and fail big time. Funny the "influencer" dropped from sight after that.
Priyanka Chopra was a real witch towards William and Catherine with her nasty remarks. She even approved a crude remark about Catherine included in a crime show she "starred" in, yeah well, the show bombed big time and now she's been Markled. I'm sorry, my heart doesn't bleed for Priyanka.

This message is locked.

Re: It's a long list

Posted by Susan T on April 1, 2024, 12:23 am, in reply to "It's a long list"

It seems like piling on because it's an old list. These people were jettisoned either before the wedding or shortly after, so why bring it up again?

Funny how nobody is brave enough to list the "friends" that were acquired after the wedding who never invite her and hubby to their parties and get-togethers.

This message is locked.

Re: It's a long list

Posted by karenl on April 1, 2024, 1:23 am, in reply to "Re: It's a long list"

Don't forget that the acquired friends after the wedding were always labeled by the media as "old friends" of Harry and Meghan.

The people in question didn't know Harry and especially Meghan from Jack Sprat before the marriage.

This message is locked.

Re: It's a long list

Posted by Martha on April 1, 2024, 11:03 am, in reply to "Re: It's a long list"

Gayle King, Oprah, Tyler Perry, George and Amal Clooney, Serena Williams and Victoria Beckham all backed away quickly once they got to know here, so they weren't Markled as much as they jumped ship before it hit the sandbar. Beyonce, JayZ and Bob Iger the same. They knew to stay back.

===

This message is locked.

Re: It's a long list

Posted by karenl on April 1, 2024, 6:52 pm, in reply to "Re: It's a long list"

Then there's Gloria Steinem, "Glo", after the car chase hoax, she's said nothing about Meghan. I think that connection has been severed.
All the people mentioned are smart enough to know when they're being used for their name(s) and status.

This message is locked.

« Back to index

111

[ Royal News and Views ]