Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

September 13 - Sussex Thread

Posted by Susan T on September 13, 2023, 7:47 am

n/t

This message is locked.

The Harry's Wife Games

Posted by Susan T on September 13, 2023, 7:55 am, in reply to "September 13 - Sussex Thread"

Nine articles about her this morning in the Daily Mail. Nine. I imagine the Mirror and the Express are the same.

After the conclusion of the Games, these same publications will moan and groan about Harry and wife stealing the spotlight. I'd love to know who is forcing them to provide drivel such as this article.

Link: How her jacket echoes the chic suit Diana wore at a VJ Day parade

This message is locked.

Re: The Harry's Wife Games

Posted by Martha on September 13, 2023, 8:56 am, in reply to "The Harry's Wife Games"

Barf. Diana would have been immaculately turned out. No comparison can be made there.

===

This message is locked.

Re: The Harry's Wife Games

Posted by Hollie24 on September 13, 2023, 11:32 am, in reply to "Re: The Harry's Wife Games"

The jacket is shapeless and the shorts are inappropriate. And what "hourglass figure"?

This message is locked.

Re: The Harry's Wife Games

Posted by karenl on September 13, 2023, 6:49 pm, in reply to "Re: The Harry's Wife Games"

The Invictus Games have officially gone to ruin. The entire "showing up late" to the Games has been labeled as a set up, no kidding. Meghan's "speech" (why she gave a speech is ridiculous, not her Games, not having anything to do with the military), has been a PR flop.
I know everyone is sick of me, but this time Harry and Meghan have made it all about the Nigerian team, hence playing the race card, Harry is even in a photo kissing the top of a US black athlete's head...unacceptable. If the Invictus Games org. and the MOD want to keep this nonsense, then it's their problem. I say they need to get rid of Harry and Meghan, first the race card, now Meghan stealing the spotlight from the athletes, as usual. As Susan pointed out, afterwards, the media will complain how the Harkles stole all the spotlight and we'll read article how upset the athletes were...then the Org. and MOD should do something.

This message is locked.

Taz

Posted by karenl on September 13, 2023, 7:00 pm, in reply to "Re: The Harry's Wife Games"

Video is from yesterday. I like Taz, but when she's praising Harry and noting how happy he looks (the old Harry), I can't agree with her, I've seen photos on Gettyimages where he's looking right at the camera, making sure his move is captured. To me, he still is the Harry is a deplorable person, look at the Invictus Trailer, after the games he'll go back to the lying, despicable person he is. This is all his PR.
I'm not going to say anything about how it's the Games/athletes that are important, we all know that, but the Sussexes are still not making it that way.
One more thing the workers at the In and Out had their privacy violated, by the looks on their faces, they didn't sign any waivers. The one young man looks frightened. In and Out should get on BackGrid and Meghan.

This message is locked.

Re: Taz

Posted by stephen on September 14, 2023, 12:44 pm, in reply to "Taz"

I Had to fastforward the Harry and Meghan bit!

This message is locked.

Re: The Harry's Wife Games

Posted by Alzma on September 13, 2023, 7:05 pm, in reply to "Re: The Harry's Wife Games"

I completely agree with. I do have to admit you have said it much nicer than I could have done!

This message is locked.

Re: The Harry's Wife Games

Posted by karenl on September 13, 2023, 7:17 pm, in reply to "Re: The Harry's Wife Games"

I had to self censor myself.

This message is locked.

Taz: Smile Assassin

Posted by karenl on September 13, 2023, 11:59 pm, in reply to "Re: The Harry's Wife Games"

One of Taz's followers sent her the true origin of the Invictus Games and the people behind it. I admit it did ring bells.

This message is locked.

Re: Taz: Smile Assassin

Posted by stephen on September 14, 2023, 1:03 pm, in reply to "Taz: Smile Assassin"

SMH!

This message is locked.

Re: Taz: Smile Assassin

Posted by stephen on September 14, 2023, 1:05 pm, in reply to "Taz: Smile Assassin"

This video explains a lot!

This message is locked.

Their Invictus 'powerplay'

Posted by Susan T on September 14, 2023, 4:40 pm, in reply to "September 13 - Sussex Thread"

Harry and Meghan's appearance with NATO chiefs in Germany today has stolen a march on Prince William in a PR battle between the two brothers and their wives, an expert told MailOnline today.

The Prince of Wales will travel to New York next week, as part of move to step up his role as a global statesman, to meet United Nations leaders and attend a summit for his £50million Earthshot Prize, which is now in its third year.

William is increasingly popular in the US and his trip has generated much interest across the Atlantic, with all major TV networks bidding for interviews.

But the Duke and Duchess of Sussex met NATO joint force commander General Luigi Miglietta today on the sidelines of Harry's Invictus Games – amid claims by athletes at the event that they felt 'caught up in the royal crossfire' between him and his family.

The couple held hands and smiled beside NATO chiefs and their families, including a large Italian and Dutch armed forces contingent, during the royal-style engagement in Dusseldorf.

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Their Invictus 'powerplay'

Posted by karenl on September 14, 2023, 6:28 pm, in reply to "Their Invictus 'powerplay'"

WME trying to boost Dimwit and Dumb's PR, since things are not going so well in Dusseldorf.

This message is locked.

Veterans question if Sussex stand-off has cost them more support from royals

Posted by Susan T on September 14, 2023, 4:55 pm, in reply to "September 13 - Sussex Thread"

Nine years ago Harry, his father and brother stood united as they attended the opening ceremony and multiple events at the games in London – but the new King and his heir have had zero involvement since Harry met Meghan.

Despite Harry's passion for Invictus, which is growing in size, officials say there have been plenty of spare seats at the Merkur Spiel-Arena in Dusseldorf. Some believe the involvement of King Charles, William and Kate would change that.

(snip)

One Team GB insider told The Daily Telegraph: 'The athletes find it bizarre but don't want to get caught up in the royal crossfire.'

(snip)

Palace sources reportedly say that Royal Family members never involve themselves in others' professional endeavours, and they would not expect the duke to voice support for William's Earthshot Prize, for example.

One critic of Harry said: 'Harry has never supported any of [the] latest [of] William's projects, not Earthshot when he is president of African Parks and an advocate for climate change... but they insist William must support Invictus. I'm so tired of this nonsense.'

Does anybody in their right mind believe that Harry and his wife would want Charles, Camilla, William, and Catherine to attend the Games and draw attention away from themselves?

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Veterans question if Sussex stand-off has cost them more support from royals

Posted by Martha on September 14, 2023, 6:01 pm, in reply to "Veterans question if Sussex stand-off has cost them more support from royals"

They royals don't step into each other's events, except on occasions when the goals of their patronages overlap. Besides, since H & M are no longer working members of the royal family why would anyone expect the senior royals to attend one of their events? Susan is right that neither Sussex would want any of the royals there, in large part to the shift in seniority where the Sussexes would be lower in rank than TRMs or the Waleses.

===

This message is locked.

Re: Veterans question if Sussex stand-off has cost them more support from royals

Posted by karenl on September 14, 2023, 6:31 pm, in reply to "Re: Veterans question if Sussex stand-off has cost them more support from royals"

Yep, the Sussexes don't want the real Royals there, they would be shoved to the back especially by an appearance by the Prince and Princess of Wales, and if their children would have made an appearance with them on the weekend, the Sussexes would have been kicked to the curb.

This message is locked.

Royals 'snub' Harry's birthday

Posted by Susan T on September 15, 2023, 4:35 pm, in reply to "September 13 - Sussex Thread"

The schism between Prince Harry and the rest of the Royal Family was laid bare today after the Palace appeared to snub the Duke of Sussex's birthday celebrations by failing to publicly acknowledge his 39th.

(Guess there must be a "schism" between "the rest of the Royal Family" and Princess Beatrice because her birthday wasn't mentioned on the Windsor social media accounts. Ditto Andrew, Eugenie, etc.)

(big snip)

Buckingham Palace has indicated that the Royal Family now only sends public birthday wishes to those who are senior working members.

(Oh, so you know the reason but still decided to make a BFD about it. Funny how reporters never get their knickers in a twist about the Harkles never publicly acknowledging relatives birthdays. Too bad there doesn't seem to be anybody assigned to reporting on the Games instead of churning out drivel about the wife's "fashion" and her husband's birthday antics.)

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Royals 'snub' Harry's birthday

Posted by karenl on September 17, 2023, 12:39 am, in reply to " Royals 'snub' Harry's birthday"

Neil Sean reported in his latest video that the King and Queen sent gifts and a card to Montecito and the Prince and Princess of Wales sent a card to Montecito. However, the media cannot be bothered with the truth when it comes to Dimwit and Dumb.
Harry himself lied, no shock there, when he told the press in Germany he had receive no birthday wishes from his family. Their staff or Mama D. had to have let him know about the gifts and cards. If there's any staff left.

This message is locked.

MEGHAN MARKLE'S INVICTUS OUTFITS | FAILED MESSAGING & MORE!

Posted by Hollie24 on September 15, 2023, 9:16 pm, in reply to "September 13 - Sussex Thread"

This message is locked.

Meghan's Stunt That Has Sparked Outrage

Posted by karenl on September 15, 2023, 11:28 pm, in reply to "MEGHAN MARKLE'S INVICTUS OUTFITS | FAILED MESSAGING & MORE!"

I wasn't going to post on the trashy duo, but a YouTube vlogger raised this story. Apparently, this is Meghan's **** *** to the Invictus Games Org. for not allowing her to film a video clip or to participate in the Closing Ceremony. Everyone knows how I feel and what the organization should do so I won't beat the dead horse again. All I can say is look at the athletes behind her, they're furious.
In a video, this vlogger has stated no one is around watching, the most people at this ceremony is the media. I've read elsewhere that the venues have been sparsely attended, the public hasn't shown up. The German public have been quite negative toward the Dimwit and the Yacht **, they're especially incensed at Harry and Meghan pulling the race card.
Oh, Harry "celebrated" his birthday early yesterday at a Beer Haus, he supposedly ate a ton of brats and downed six beers. The media insists they were "small beers", yeah, well, I've had German beers and the smallest are still about 10 oz. however, when he showed up today for the events, it was reported he looked pretty hungover. Then he's sucking down another "small beer" today at an event "for his birthday". They are a disgrace.
I'm seriously tempted to contact the Invictus Games, the MOD, Boeing and my Congressional Rep. Don Bacon, a retired AF General. At least I would tell Don Bacon that Harry has insulted the military with his remarks, insulted our Constitution and maybe throw in he needs to be deported (if I feel like it). I think the US should not participate in the Games until Harry and Meghan are removed. Long shot, I know, but I can try.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12522525/Meghan-marches-victorious-athletes-following-cycling-medal-ceremony-Invictus-Games-Dusseldorf.html

This message is locked.

Re: Meghan's Stunt That Has Sparked Outrage

Posted by Hollie24 on September 16, 2023, 12:46 am, in reply to "Meghan's Stunt That Has Sparked Outrage"

Dressed completely inappropriately, yet thinks she's a fash-onn icon:check. Grinning maniacally at absolutely nothing:check. Doing something completely inappropriate, yet believes she has the right to do it: check. Fails to grasp that she's ticked off everyone: check.

Yep, hi Meghan.

This message is locked.

Re: Meghan's Stunt That Has Sparked Outrage

Posted by Susan T on September 16, 2023, 3:27 pm, in reply to "Meghan's Stunt That Has Sparked Outrage"

n/t

This message is locked.

Mole weighs in

Posted by Hollie24 on September 16, 2023, 5:19 pm, in reply to "September 13 - Sussex Thread"

This message is locked.

Re: Mole weighs in

Posted by Martha on September 16, 2023, 7:23 pm, in reply to "Mole weighs in"

She complains about the press coverage being centered on Meghan but most of the photos she puts in her video are of Meghan. Really, I do agree with everything Mole said but it would have carried more weight if the photos were of the participants and Meghan was blanked.

===

This message is locked.

Re: Mole weighs in

Posted by karenl on September 17, 2023, 12:34 am, in reply to "Re: Mole weighs in"

That's a good point. Tudor didn't show any photos or video (that's the angriest I've ever heard from HG Tudor). On the video, notice very few claps from the bystanders. Every photo of Meghan shows people around her frowning/not pleased, which they had every right to feel.

This message is locked.

« Back to index

187

[ Royal News and Views ]