Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor

Posted by karenl on June 8, 2023, 11:37 pm

"There had been talk that she was forced to leave Windsor but the Daily Express’s Royal correspondent Richard Palmer, who was speaking on our Royal Roundup earlier today, said this was not the case.

He says she could have stayed in her home for as long as she wanted and that King Charles has bought her a house in Derbyshire, so she can be closer to her family.

Mr Palmer said: “She's got children and grandchildren in the north of England and my understanding is she wanted to spend more time with them."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1778914/Angela-Kelly-Windsor-home-King-Charles

Re: Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor

Posted by Susan T on June 9, 2023, 12:39 am, in reply to "Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor"

If she wasn't forced to move, then why the cryptic messages from her on social media and why did her "friends" claim she was forced?

And Charles didn't buy her a house. The Duchy of Lancaster purchased the house, but it's only hers in the sense that she can occupy it rent free until the day she dies. When she dies, the Duchy can either rent it out or sell it. It doesn't pass to her heirs. That's what was reported weeks ago in the Daily Mail, and I bet some other Express reporter also wrote about it.

I swear reporters don't read what is published by their employers.

Re: Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor

Posted by karenl on June 9, 2023, 12:54 am, in reply to "Re: Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor"

If you notice, he really down played the tension between Angela and Charles/Royal Family. I don't believe that, her cryptic messages wouldn't have appeared if there wasn't an atmosphere of high tension between Angela and Charles/Royals.

The Express did run stories about all this at the same time as the Mail. I think they run the same story weeks later as a filler story and figure the public won't catch on.

Re: Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor

Posted by Susan T on June 9, 2023, 1:20 am, in reply to "Re: Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor"

But the original story was that she wasn't given the choice to stay put, which to me makes sense because the place would be needed for another employee.

Naturally, if Charles had to find her other accommodations, he would ask where she wanted to go, and she would choose to move close to her family once it was made clear there were no housing options available in Windsor.

I could deal with them repeating the same story, but that's not they're doing. They are reporting a new version of an event they have previously covered without admitting that the info they now claim is false was what they themselves reported. Essentially saying "Don't believe what my colleagues write, believe me. The fact that I haven't even hinted at having a source for my version is immaterial."

"I've been told" isn't a source. He has to at least give us a clue, such as "by a friend of Angela", "by a palace aide", etc. For all we know, he could be reporting what he was told by a check-out clerk at the supermarket.

Re: Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor

Posted by karenl on June 9, 2023, 7:23 pm, in reply to "Re: Angela Kelly "Wasn't Forced Out Of Her Home", She Could Have Stayed At Windsor"

Yep, I remember the original story. Charles was the ogre, he was throwing Angela out of her Grace and Favor and even stop her mobile service, she had to return the phone, I think. Well, duh. This was the story per the press, they added that Charles would be providing her another home and she wanted to be near her children.
This is supposedly the Express's "Royal expert" and it's weird that after so many weeks he brings out this "new info" when that story has passed long ago.

« Back to index

299

[ Royal News and Views ]