Yes, Charles had an employee complain about other staff, not Charles, treating her horribly. I wonder if Meghan was either told about this by Harry or did her own research on the family and decided that Charles was guilty for not firing Fawcett on the spot.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/dec/07/race.monarchy

The Sussex employees are working under non-disclosure agreements, which protect prominent families from having their dirty linens aired in public. But the NDAs draw the line at covering up illegal activity as a job requirement. So how many glasses of sirah I had last night is protected, but hiding from authorities that my hootch was illegally imported is not. If the working conditions are as bad as we think they are, the Sussexes could be in violation of California employment law. So an employee can blow the whistle on an abusive or coercive work environment and not be in violation of the agreement. If any employees aren't sure what to do, they should contact one of us immediately for a consultation.

===