It rings true that the genesis of the rift between Catherine and Meghan would have been over treatment of Catherine's staff. That early story of Catherine telling Meghan not to be abrupt with the staff was true, apparently. We wondered if Meghan had tried to take surreptitious photos of the Cambridge home or kids and got caught, but it looks like Meghan snapped at staff and was told to knock it off.
My hunch is that staff went to the Times as soon as the interview was announced, and they were given permission at some level to talk to a reporter. The Times mentions an internal memo or report from Jason Knauf which makes me wonder if they have a copy of that. Did someone leak BP personnel info to blow up Meghan's victim story? After the interview airs, will the Times drop a bombshell article with evidence that dismantles the Sussex narrative of being oppressed victims that torpedoes their credibility? If the Harkles go too far in the interview will that be the ammo needed to remove Harry's title?
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index | View thread »
Responses are not allowed!