Previous Message

let's look at facts.

No Barriers (aka "Mo Barriers" or 'Faux Accounting") was launched in September 2022

https://www.csulb.edu/news/article/cal-state-long-beach-launches-its-ambitious-no-barriers-campaign

It has 'closed' per the announcement in June 2024,

https://www.csulb.edu/no-barriers


basically two calendar years, if one is believe Jane's BS, it has $311 in commitments.

Now comes the CSU OFFICIAL REPORT of donor giving.

https://www.calstate.edu/impact-of-the-csu/government/Advocacy-and-State-Relations/legislativereports1/Annual-Report-on-Donor-Support-2024.pdf

The OFFICIAL report of CSU states CLEARLY that Long Beach had $35 mil in commitments in '22-'23 and only $22 mil if actual receipts.

Given that, $311 million minus $35 million would mean Jane is effectively saying Beach rasied $275 mil alone in commitments this last year alone, or Jane has some other different accounting system than what CSU reports, lol. Or Jane is putting the money in off shore accounts.

Bull-Shit

there are so many obvious questions, that Jane should answer or step down, because this announcement is insulting and ridiculous on so many levels. I'm a simple person, expect simple answers, that's reasonable. Cities/Politicians, Corporations also do similar BUll-Shit posturing

1) What is the breakdown of giving? of course not in pennies, at least to the level of $10 million increments would give some level of credibility if it could actually comes out. they got to $311 million by someone's accounting, so PROVE it with transparency

2) Where is this $311 actually reported?

3) The announcement clearly implies it is ALL philiphantric, or donors. Prove it!

4) WHy in hades if 'no barriers' is so wildly successful as implied, then why would not it be continued?

5) In two years, what is the actual receipts and actual traceable commitments and RECEIPTS of gifts specifically traceable to 'No Barriers'

6) the CSU report shows Beach raised $44 mil in commitments BEFORE the "Mo Barriers" was even launched, then less than that after launched

7) Publish the endowment year ending 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and show how this made up $311 impacted


when something makes no common sense, does not pass a simple sniff test, and can't be backed up, it's time to call Bull-Shit.

If Jane can not produce the accounting, which IS NOT HARD TO DO IF ONE WANTS TO BE TRANSPARENT, then she needs to resign. It has the appearance of taking credit for something she really has not done

the announcement is giving a fluffed up impression, it implies the endowment should be exploding (should double to $200) due to these gifts.


again, this is BULL-SHIT from Jane, and the hyperbole, if it can't be backed up, is unbecoming.

would be oh so happy to be PROVEN incorrect on this