Posted by Rizwan on 4/10/2011, 14:26:56, in reply to "Re: Nobel Prize for Literature"
208.118.161.49
Interesting article on Americans & the Nobel:
http://entertainment.salon.com/2011/10/03/why_americans_don_t_win_nobel/singleton/
--Previous Message--
: After I posted my guesses this morning, I ran across
: this quote someone had extracted from an article in
: The Guardian:
:
: "So is it finally Philp Roth's turn? The
: much-touted Syrian poet Adonis sits atop the betting
: at 4/1, with last year's favourite, the Swedish poet
: Thomas Tranströmer, following at 11/2. The Hungarian
: novelist Péter Nádas comes next, with the Japanese
: novelist Haruki Murakami close behind – both seem to
: have important books out this year in Swedish
: translation. As I write, Philip Roth languishes at
: 25/1.
:
: "Anyone who fancies a bet – and who is foolhardy
: enough to pay any attention to tips from the Guardian
: books desk – might consider Algerian novelist Assia
: Djebar: the first woman cited by Ladbrokes. When the
: permanent secretary of the Academy, Peter Englund,
: came in to talk about picking the winner, he admitted
: that he was conscious of the lack of women laureates –
: though he also insisted that individual winners stood
: only for themselves. Surely in the year of the Arab
: spring a woman author writing in Arabic must be in
: with a strong shout."
:
: So Adonis or Transtromer could be the "poet I've
: never heard of." I've seen books by Nadas on the
: bookstore shelves next to Nabakov, but that's all I
: know about him. I haven't heard of Djebar, but at
: least my hunch about an Arab Spring tie-in wasn't too
: far-fetched. Actually El Saadawi could be a candidate
: for the Peace prize as well as the Literature for her
: activism on behalf of Arab women.
:
: Further Googling shows that Thomas Pynchon actually
: has the best odds of any English-language author at
: 17-1, with Don DeLillo, Joyce Carol Oates, and John
: Banville sharing Roth's odds at 25-1. They might give
: it to Pynchon just to see if he would come out in
: public to get it.
:
: Mario Vargas Llosa was a 40-1 pick, so these odds
: obviously don't mean a whole lot.
:
: With that disclaimer, I copied the following from
: Ladbrokes web site, the English oddsmakers whose odds
: are the ones always quoted (can you just see Americans
: betting on literature ) I've at least heard of most of
: these, but I've read only about a third of them.
:
: Adonis
: 4/1
: Tomas Transtromer
: 6/1
: Haruki Murakami
: 8/1
: Peter Nadas
: 10/1
: Assia Djebar
: 12/1
: Ko Un
: 14/1
: Les Murray
: 16/1
: Thomas Pynchon
: 18/1
: Philip Roth
: 20/1
: Nuruddin Farah
: 20/1
: Mircea Cartarescu
: 25/1
: Cormac McCarthy
: 25/1
: John Banville
: 25/1
: Joyce Carol Oates
: 25/1
: Amos Oz
: 25/1
: Antonio Lobo Antunes
: 25/1
: Bob Dylan
: 25/1
: K. Satchidanandan
: 33/1
: Colm Toibin
: 33/1
: Don DeLillo
: 33/1
: Claudio Magris
: 33/1
: Adam Zagajewski
: 33/1
: Antonio Tabucchi
: 33/1
: Alice Munro
: 33/1
: A.S. Byatt
: 33/1
: Milan Kundera
: 33/1
: Cees Nooteboom
: 33/1
: Ismail Kadare
: 33/1
: Ngugi wa Thiong'o
: 33/1
: Rajendra Bhandari
: 40/1
: Christa Wolf
: 40/1
: Maya Angelou
: 40/1
: E.L Doctorow
: 40/1
: Margaret Atwood
: 40/1
: Ernesto Cardenal
: 40/1
: Juan Marse
: 40/1
: Bei Dao
: 40/1
: Patrick Modiano
: 40/1
: Vaclav Havel
: 40/1
: Yves Bonnefoy
: 50/1
: Michel Tournier
: 50/1
: Viktor Pelevin
: 66/1
: Ian McEwan
: 50/1
: Salman Rushdie
: 50/1
: Javier Marias
: 50/1
: Carlos Fuentes
: 50/1
: Umberto Eco
: 50/1
: Elias Khoury
: 50/1
: Louise Gluck
: 50/1
: Samih al-Qasim
: 50/1
: Peter Handke
: 66/1
: Gitta Sereny
: 66/1
: William Trevor
: 50/1
: Shlomo Kalo
: 66/1
: Chinua Achebe
: 66/1
: Anne Carson
: 66/1
: A.B Yehoshua
: 66/1
: Juan Goytisolo
: 66/1
: Luis Goytisolo
: 80/1
: David Malouf
: 80/1
: Paul Auster
: 80/1
: Per Petterson
: 80/1
: Jonathan Littell
: 80/1
: Jon Fosse
: 80/1
: Mahasweta Devi
: 80/1
: Peter Carey
: 80/1
: Marge Piercy
: 80/1
: Mary Gordon
: 80/1
: William H. Gass
: 80/1
: Yevgeny Yevtushenko
: 80/1
: Vassilis Alexakis
: 80/1
: Eeva Kilpi
: 100/1
: Michael Ondaatje
: 100/1
: Kjell Askildsen
: 100/1
: Julian Barnes
: 100/1
: Atiq Rahimi
: 100/1
: F. Sionil Jose
: 100/1
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: Intriguing. My only guess is that it will be someone
: that I have never heard of. It generally is.
:
: I would think not Roth. He lacks the political
: correctness that they seem to love. Of course they
: gave it to Saul Bellow. Bellow won as just a young
: pup of 61. He lived almost thirty more years.
: Morrison was only 62 when she won. So maybe Murakami
: or Rushdie.
:
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: It will be announced Thursday. Any predictions or
: favorites?
:
: Will the prize committee jump on the Arab Spring
: bandwagon and select someone like Nawal El Saadawi?
:
: There hasn't been an Asian winner in a while, so is it
: Haruki Murakami's turn? The publishers of his
: forthcoming huge novel 1Q84 would love that.
:
: Will they finally end the ban on American winners and
: give it to Philip Roth? The last American was Toni
: Morrison in 1993.
:
: Roth is 78 as is Cormac McCarthy. Umberto Eco is 79,
: as is Nawal El Saadawi. It may be now or never for
: them. Murakami is 62 and Salman Rushdie only 64, so
: they'll probably have to wait.
:
: Or will it be someone we've never heard of, probably a
: poet. The last poet was Wislawa Szymborska in 1996.
:
:
:
:
:
Message Thread
![]()
« Back to index