Posted by STATS on 7/5/2012, 5:38 pm, in reply to "Re: Angelo Caloiaro Pro am"
I have to call into question KSTATEZAG's blind defense of everything Zag. We all know that a Zag fan will NEVER concede that any WCC player is better than their one of their own. I would argue that Angelo is a better player.
Yes, Harris had a better 3 pt shooting percentage. 41.4% to Angelo's 39.2%. However, Harris (smartly) took way fewer threes. Angelo made almost twice the amount of 3s that Harris did. 56-29. Angelo was a 3 pt threat, Harris was not.
Angelo scored better (14.2-13.1). Yeah, Harris shot ONE percentage point better (50.2-49.0).
Angelo is a far better FT shooter. 79.3% to 67.2%.
Angelo also had twice the assists that Harris had (2.4-1.2).
Harris had more steals (1.6-0.9).
Both had less than one block a game.
Who has a better handle? Harris cannot dribble, so that one is easy.
Better defender? Harris improved, but lots of blow bys.
If anything, it is close overall. Take away the Zag hype and it's probably a toss up, with the edge to Angelo.
And Harris is two years older.
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »