Posted by (no name) on February 1, 2005, 5:49 pm, in reply to "Part 8" And to BACON!: "Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit..." Christ, you must be a big hit with the ladies. Oh and it's Triple-DES encoding, to make it just as fun for everyone. For everyone: D9B1FD67F593F81320671578B6529CE3D9D9C6661687ADCDBAD60F55E906A1C27E14F1 I mean the fact that I keep banning his IP and deleting his accounts should be enough of a hint for someone that "speaks" latin. Obviously that's conjecture and untrue, but it's out there and that makes it truth. I'm confused as to what I refused to see, though. It's a famous Latin tag, BACON!. I came across it and thought it seemed appropriate. It's a "quote". Nothing more sinister than that. But, you know, let's turn it into another reason I'm a cunt. There's this thing called Google. It's quite useful. I keep coming back because you don't want me to. It's called spite. If I actually wanted to be abused I'd read the abuse. You're wasting more energy than I am. Why didn't you delete this thread? (C) 1988 Curtis\Elton I didn't look that up, I remembered it. WITH MY BRAIN. And I quoted it because it's TRUE. YOU FREAK OF NATURE. 300. FOR CHRIST'S SAKE. Then you deserve all the contempt we already heap upon you and more. Dump the happy pills, you were more interesting as a maudlin Generation Z dissatisified ungrateful little ####. Plus there's always the hope that you'll open a vein. Remember: Down the tracks, not across the street. Spite in repsonse to contempt makes an excuse for more contempt. Circular logic. What am I ungrateful for exactly? Loonpants attacking me? Spite in repsonse to contempt makes an excuse for more contempt. The thing about arguing on the Internet is that the truth is not solid. Not the meaning of the words, no. Not the meaning of the sentence. But ambiguities can always be denied and labelled after the event. Maybe I didn't mean "the truth is not solid" so much as ambiguities don't have to exist. Whatever BACON! may have meant when he typed whatever it was he typed, he can claim the opposite and, for all pratical purposes, it would then be so. His word against mine. And his word came first, so his word is superior. 2005-02-01 13:47:43 Behind the beauty of the anonymity of the internet is the safe wall of self-righteousness. You hide behind it like a sad little man safe in the knowledge that at the end of the day, there's no actual point to this thread, other than to make sure you don't accept any words that you don't want to. "You lack any tolerance for anything people say." Look, if Loonpants is a figment of my imagination, could someone please just tell me outright? Can you understand that? Would arguing with that person change their mind? He thinks you're a cunt. Accept it and move on. If you can't then don't blame anyone else. It's not his fault he thinks you're a cunt. It's not entirely yours either, but you don't help matters by doing things that he doesn't like. But then that's not the point of you doing them is it?
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 19:27:36
Nope.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 19:28:54
Still childish. How's that working out?
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 19:29:12
What's nothing new? The fact that you were a cunt then and you're a cunt now? That much is clear and thanks for pointing out that i'm not alone in my feelings
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 19:29:54
LOL. Latin, now!!!!
LOL
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 19:30:25
I was being spat on then because I was there. And I'm being spat on now because I'm there.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 19:30:52
What? Latin's shit now, is that it?
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 19:31:28
lol
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 21:24:52
And now, unable to justify why he should have been the victim even though he was never targetted by myself, and then attacked me because I wouldn't contribute to his self-mutilation, he changed languages and tries to effect (from what I can tell, as I don't speak latin) the same kind of arguments. What makes it worse is he appears to believe that he needs to resort to a pretty much dead language in a vein attempt to stop any counter arguments, which have been prevalant all along, but he refused to see them because they didn't attack him.
Last edited by BACON! on 2005-01-31 21:25:26
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 21:35:29
Insisting on taking arguments to a language not widely understood by many surely must be pointless to many, but if he insists.
D4333CADD4C4CD1CF0730F2B48DB09F2E67638C11A353862E0089AFB05E981C7DF52B0
9F005FF9C8D3334E9A93245C1D59309B3685E5029ECF5CFC00F476A6D5EEB3073118CC
95EAD085350DEBF8DC012E72C889B2B9591F6B2E97C6B3DC8FCA7F47ABEF32E014FD4D
10952A2634FD4AB4DC92597D364D6175DDC81D71639AE8F3EBE7FE2DA19B76DB624E1C
B922BFA6FC4BE0534128D6F524FE86BB19191BC9E5472C5351F9CF6EA0059E3B134F4C
8E7584EBE6E9019B404D606B0B2F2AD5D10360CE1C978136A9858F69AE33BABBBE8BA6
B62FE9
Last edited by Deckchair on 2005-02-01 15:38:20
Deckchair :
Souperier Beeng
2005-02-01 02:24:15
I am confused, he claims he doesn't want abuse yet knowing that's all he will ever get off this site he returns day after day.
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 12:12:51
"And now, unable to justify why he should have been the victim even though he was never targetted by myself, and then attacked me because I wouldn't contribute to his self-mutilation, he changed languages and tries to effect (from what I can tell, as I don't speak latin) the same kind of arguments. What makes it worse is he appears to believe that he needs to resort to a pretty much dead language in a vain attempt to stop any counter arguments, which have been prevalant all along, but he refused to see them because they didn't attack him."
Last edited by Meh on 2005-02-01 12:14:35
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-02-01 12:17:23
Don't think so cunto. i just read the last paragraph of all that bollocks. Therefore, you expended more energy writing it than i did not reading it. You pathetic little cunt.
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 12:19:53
Unless there was a point to all that, and there wasn't, you just expended some of energy for a brief rush. Which is gone.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-02-01 12:22:49
And you just expended some energy telling me THAT. What's your point? Is this another rule that i've missed where we've got to expend the least amount of energy?? Jesus, you're ####ing crazy.
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-02-01 12:29:31
He should use Google to see what I wrote then. It isn't sinister either.
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 12:33:44
Everything goes over your head, Loonpants. You should go to Jamaica and become a limbo dancer.
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 12:34:26
I get news results, which is nice.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-02-01 12:35:11
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. THAT'S GREAT. YOU'RE ####ING GREAT AT LOOKING STUFF UP. IT MUST MAKE YOU LOOK REALLY CLEVER ON INTERNET FORUMS.
Oh,no. It makes you look like a cunt.
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 12:49:15
Everything goes over your head, Loonpants. You should go to Jamaica and become a limbo dancer.
Last edited by Meh on 2005-02-01 12:52:54
Deckchair :
Souperier Beeng
2005-02-01 13:09:28
It's called spite
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 13:15:39
"Then you deserve all the contempt we already heap upon you and more."
Deckchair :
Souperier Beeng
2005-02-01 13:25:19
There's nothing circular about it at all, your poor logic skills hold no water here boyo.
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 13:28:09
It would in the real world though.
Spite in repsonse to contempt makes an excuse for more contempt.
Spite in repsonse to contempt makes an excuse for more contempt.
Spite in repsonse to contempt makes an excuse for more contempt.
Spite in repsonse to contempt makes an excuse for more contempt.
Deckchair :
Souperier Beeng
2005-02-01 13:34:32
Nope, not there either.
That's a load of bollocks for a start. The lack of auditory or physical cues do not negate the meaning of any reasonably well written sentence.
Last edited by Deckchair on 2005-02-01 13:36:14
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 13:40:16
Spite in repsonse to contempt makes an excuse for more contempt.
:
You lack any tolerance for anything people say.
Meh :
Radish
2005-02-01 13:50:29
You don't exist.
Last edited by Meh on 2005-02-01 13:51:09
Shanx :
No 1 Joe Fan
2005-02-01 13:56:28
Someone doesn't like you.
Message Thread:
![]()
« Back to thread