Posted by Hate on February 1, 2005, 5:48 pm, in reply to "Part 7" "I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about." Then you're incredibly stupid and possibly illiterate, which isn't my problem. Notice that many of my posts are actually addressed to BACON!, but his entire strawman argument has been adressed to Shan or Loonpants or some omniscient narrator. And still he refuses to deal with any of my counter-arguments. Why should he, when he can just label them as rubbish? He lies like a trouper though. What, "lies like a trouper"? Oh, but it was just an observaaaaation, mister! I didn't mean no haaaarrrrm by it. Your previous post was a lie, or at the very least a false insinuation based on a strawman argument. "a false insinuation based on a strawman argument" "a false insinuation based on a strawman argument" "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." "pretending to be unable to spot the parts of that post at which I may have taken offence." "pretending to be unable to spot the parts of that post at which I may have taken offence." "pretending to be unable to spot the parts of that post at which I may have taken offence." "pretending to be unable to spot the parts of that post at which I may have taken offence." "pretending to be unable to spot the parts of that post at which I may have taken offence." STILL ####ING DOING IT. It's BACON!'s argument. I'm turning it on him. Do you see how that works? "He just wants to be the victim, and because nobody is helping him to be that victim he just insults." Lies. Why? Why bother making up something like that? I'm not stupid, you're not stupid. Why make up such a pointless lie? "The bullying he received at school seems to be what he continues to crave." Don't be stupid. What, have you got "Psychology For Beginners" next to the computer or something? Right, I CRAVE all this ####ing SHIT. THAT'S WHY I'M COMPLAINING ABOUT IT. ####ING FAUX-MORON. And no, careful wording does not negate anything. You want me to take your "observations" badly so you can continue burying me under your strawman, all the time insisiting that it's my fault. Fine. ___________________________________________ Took you long enough, for Christ's sake. I just think it's great that I'm the villain, that I deserve pain, just sight-unseen. Even when I'm being attacked by Loonpants.I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT BACON! AND YOU KNOW IT. I don't know where BACON!'s coming from, I really don't. Talking all his bollocks but refusing to even acknowledge what I've written in response. Real ####ing mature. What's worse is the argument he's rigidly building is a blatant strawman. Unless he's got me mixed up with Loonpants. I think he's just bored. I don't believe for a second that he actually thinks retaliation is the same thing as attacking unprovoked. RETALIATION. Most if not all of my posts in this thread constitute a response to an unprovoked attack. BACON!'s "argument" constitutes nothing so much as "Stop hitting yourself! -THWACK- Stop hitting yourself! -THWACK- Stop hitting yourself!" And no, that's not a ####ing insult, it's an observation. That's how it appears to me. Aw, and look: a snidey closing comment from Deckchair. Gosh, that's me told. Must stop doing whatever it is I'm doing, assuming I'm doing anything. Which I'm not. But obviously it's my own fault. Whatever it is. Clearly I just want to be the victim, why else would Loonpants attack me for no reason? I don't deny there's something wrong with me. That's just where I differ from the likes of Loonpants. ___________________________________________ 7.10 and still here. Huh. Of course, my (and everyone else's) suggestion was implemented. Later than they would have wanted, though. Oh, almost forgot, while I was getting vilified for agreeing with everyone else, the late Treepwood, who started the whole thing, was deliberately prolonging the situation by winding the invaders up. He got a cash prize. I realise it can be twisted into that shape, yes. Didn't stop me though.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:09:57
wibble wibble wibble. You're just rambling now. I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, have you bacon? you're just an absolute horror of a human being. Just die.
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 17:10:24
And look, he's now decided that my last post needed to be an attack, not what it actually was, an observation equating his past bulling to his expectations that he should be attacked.
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 17:11:36
Yes Loonpants, he's making false determinations about others posts, when the posts remain and everyone can plainly see there isn't any shred of truth in his portrayal of the situation.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:12:08
Lies. I never said that. I think you've succesfully broken the record for longest sustained strawman argument. Well done. Did you want to contribute in a meaningful way at all?
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:13:52
oooooh, cunto. That sounded like an attack....bully bully bully bully.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:14:16
NOT WHEN I WAS ATTACKED FIRST, STUPID
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 17:15:50
Yes loonpants, he seems to enjoy creating an attack - just so he can call himself a victim.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:16:10
hmmm. Can you point me towards the rule book please? It's getting quite confusing with all the hypocritical posts you're making. But that's probably down to your IQ or something. Or Possibly something not quite right in your head.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:18:38
I'm ignoring that argument because it's bollocks from the ground up. You can attack me, but I can't respond, I just have to take it. Or I'm being hypocritical else. Right. I'm a lot of things, but not stupid.
Last edited by Meh on 2005-01-31 17:19:47
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:19:43
"Notice that many of my posts are actually addressed to BACON!, but his entire strawman argument has been adressed to Shan or Loonpants or some omniscient narrator. "
LOL. You mean like you do, you crazy cunt!!
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:20:23
What a pointless lie. I've adressed most of my posts in this thread to you. Or BACON!
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 17:21:05
It appears that he is very justified at labelling most other posts as rubbish, probably because they don't contain an attack on him and doesn't justify his aparrrent obsession with being the victim.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:21:48
And still he refuses to deal with any of my counter-arguments. Why should he, when he can just label them as rubbish?
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:22:28
"And still he refuses to deal with any of my counter-arguments."
SEE!!! YOU CRAZY CUNT
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 17:24:01
And once again, he looks to insults.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:24:31
See what? He flatly refuses to deal with anything I've said. He just waves it away. "Goodbye argument, I'm pretending you don't exist now."
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:25:46
"And once again, he looks to insults."
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 17:26:34
And heres another label I could throw in: Self Obsessed Victim Wannabe
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:27:12
" Oh, but it was just an observaaaaation, mister! I didn't mean no haaaarrrrm by it. "
LOL. what the #### does that mean? I think you'd better calm down before you explode. What a dick.
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 17:27:27
He just wants to be the victim, and because nobody is helping him to be that victim he just insults.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:28:26
I'm going home, cunto. Just so you're not wasting the bandwidth constantly refreshing.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:28:37
"a false insinuation based on a strawman argument"
Last edited by Meh on 2005-01-31 18:05:37
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:28:51
although you probably will anyway
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 17:29:01
WOW.BLAH BLAH BLAH. Like i'm reading all that shit below. You ####ing pathetic loser.
Last edited by Loonpants on 2005-01-31 19:05:47
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 17:31:11
"LOL. what the #### does that mean?"
And since this thread won't last much longer, I'd just like to point out that this is nothing new. Cast your arse back to 2001, when GazzaB got the ezBoard flooded by scores of SF fans. Mostly in one thread, which everyone was saying should probably be closed. As soon as I expressed the same opinion as everyone else, and called for the same action to take place as everyone else, everyone else immediately turned around and spat in my face for suggesting it.
Last edited by Meh on 2005-01-31 19:09:28
Deckchair :
Souperier Beeng
2005-01-31 17:32:25
What a pointless life he leads.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 19:15:47
weee. Referring to 4 year old threads....you do realise that's PARTICULARLY sad, don't you? ####ing loser.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 19:18:02
Unprecedented. Close it again for ####'s sake.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 19:18:48
"Referring to 4 year old threads....you do realise that's PARTICULARLY sad, don't you? ####ing loser."
Splog :
Man of Many Hats
2005-01-31 19:19:54
hello!
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 19:20:28
Hello, Splog. How is your HAT this evening?
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 19:22:37
It's not twisted into anything. That's just plain sad.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 19:24:20
It doesn't keep me awake at nights or anything. I just remembered it and realised how similar yet long ago it was. I thought it was telling.
Last edited by Meh on 2005-01-31 19:24:45
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 19:25:58
Well, it wasn't.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 19:26:43
Yes it was. It tells that this is far from anything new.
Message Thread:
« Back to thread