Posted by Hate on February 1, 2005, 4:46 pm, in reply to "Part 5" "You mean less to me than the squirrel I saw squashed on the road on the way into work. Why should we care and have to justify anything to you? You're nothing." If that was true you'd leave me alone. And to answer your question, BECAUSE YOU KEEP ATTACKING ME FOR NO REASON, SHITSMEAR! You really are rather pathetic and sad. He fails to grasp that whatever his spin on the situation he believes to put in place is false, as it was I who made those statements and given that it is only I who knows I did not post it with offensive intentions. "My posts were in no way offensive" Oh, for ####'s sake give it a rest. " your pretending to be unable to spot the parts of that post at which I may - as I believe was the intention - have taken offence." Also, "hypocritical" does mean something, it's not just a random thing you can call someone. "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." Did I just imagine that sentence? And pathetic. Loonpants meanwhile contents himself with pouncing on any sentence I can make and automatically claiming the exact opposite. Kind of like what BACON!'s doing but with more finesse. "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." "It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable." " your pretending to be unable to spot the parts of that post at which I may - as I believe was the intention - have taken offence." No, I don't you ####ing pathetic cunt If that wasn't ironic, BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA This has got past 200 posts now, Loonpants. Think on it. "If you don't want to carry on, just stop." Stop WHAT, moron? Responding to your unprovoked attacks? BECAUSE THAT'S ALL I'M DOING AND YOU KNOW IT ANSWER THE QUESTION
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 13:01:38
Pathetic.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 13:04:01
You can't come up with anything better than that*. I consider that a moral victory. Articulate sentences win out over simplistic insults employed for no reason at all.
*although of course you're now bound to say "YES I CAN YOU'RE JUST NOT WORTH IT". But I imagine I got it right the first time. You appear to have the wit of a paramecium.
Last edited by Meh on 2005-01-31 13:05:03
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 13:12:25
Absolutely pathetic.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 13:12:59
Paramecium.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 13:15:30
Absolutely pathetic.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 13:15:54
Moral victory.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 13:16:52
Victory of what, cunto?
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 13:18:59
I'm merely responding in kind to a series of unprovoked attacks. Since I can construct sentences, I figure that gives me the lead on points.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 13:19:29
yeah, points.......
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 13:19:46
You ####ing crazy, pathetic fool.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 13:23:04
I'm merely responding in kind to a series of unprovoked attacks. Since I can construct sentences, I figure that gives me the lead on points. I'M NOT ACTUALLY SITTING HERE WITH A SCOREBOARD, IT'S A "METAPHOR".
http://www.answers.com/metaphor&r=67
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 13:23:17
Again, more insults and more repetative posts just furthering my original reasoning. He takes a stance on a post and tries to justify why it was an attack on him, then when it is shown it was in no way and attack - he has to justify it more by reapeating the same disproven junk. My posts were in no way offensive, however all that he has said about it was they were - not even bothering to ask what my intention was. Indeed however much he like to believe his points are the only acceptable ones, because it is him that is making them - additionally his need to be attacked therefore it must be seen as an attack it is not the case.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 13:23:43
Meh :
Radish 2005-01-31 13:23:04
I'm merely responding in kind to a series of unprovoked attacks.
Meh :
Radish 2005-01-31 13:23:04
Responding in kind to a series of unprovoked attacks.
Meh :
Radish 2005-01-31 13:23:04
To a series of unprovoked attacks.
Meh :
Radish 2005-01-31 13:23:04
Series of unprovoked attacks.
Meh :
Radish 2005-01-31 13:23:04
Unprovoked attacks.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 13:25:25
Nothing's been proven, BACON!. This is the Internet. The only possib;e evidence is your word against mine.
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 13:26:23
And thus he continues on his merry crusade being hypocritical.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 13:29:13
Notice how BACON! keeps the faith with his strategy of talking about me instead of to me, so he can use the excuse of "I wasn't talking to you". Also his wide-eyed innocent act shows no signs of flagging.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 14:18:01
"Also, "hypocritical" does mean something, it's not just a random thing you can call someone. "
You ####ing can. Look, he said it up there. And i'm calling you it now. HYPOCRITICAL.
Last edited by Loonpants on 2005-01-31 14:18:13
BACON! :
Sah!
2005-01-31 14:28:51
And another non-sensical post in the same repative style as previously show. Thus proving my initial observation.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 14:48:19
Oh yes, I forgot about the thing where BACON! labels what I say so he doesn't have to actually deal with it. Claiming it's nonsensical whether it is or not, because Internet grammar dictates that it automatically will become so. Oh, and using the word "repetitive" as if it's my fault, as if I'm replying to myself with nothing but a brick wall, as if BACON! is a multiple personality or something.
"It needs to be done soon, as he's getting boring and far too predictable."
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 14:49:01
"Loonpants meanwhile contents himself with pouncing on any sentence I can make and automatically claiming the exact opposite."
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 14:50:32
If that was ironic, congratulations, it's brilliant. Really.
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 14:55:03
Worthless piece of shit.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 14:55:55
You didn't notice the irony, did you? AH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 15:01:15
Oh deary me. I would have thought i didn't have to validate it. Shame, you're more stupid and worthless than i first thought. If you don't want to carry on, just stop. It's as simple as that....simple enough for even someone like you.
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 15:02:46
Stop WHAT, moron? Responding to your unprovoked attacks? BECAUSE THAT'S ALL I'M DOING AND YOU KNOW IT
Loonpants :
Justice Cocks
2005-01-31 15:05:06
I can happily do this forever, cunto. I enjoy it. Haven't you ever got any work to do? Surely you have to earn your shiny 10 pence somehow??
Meh :
Radish
2005-01-31 15:05:51
ANSWER THE QUESTION
Message Thread:
« Back to thread