I'm not going to give you a backlash Vespa but I will reply to some of the points you make.
Yes we had a plan under Dave Mantle, but it was completely unsustainable without his or his company's involvement. Once he lost interest that plan was worthless as it was completely unaffordable. May as well compare it to Roman Abramovics plan for Chelsea for how relevant it is to us now.
I don't think there are investors. No indication that there are. Why do you think there are? I'm sure NH is looking for them but highly doubt there are any at the moment. I think you are barking up the wrong tree with that one to be honest.
The 100 club was a joke from the start. No arguments from me there. The mag/program situation doesn't fill you with confidence at the competency either I'll agree with you on that too. Not sure the speed of highlights or boss/player interviews is a particularly make or break issue to be honest.
I'm not for a moment saying NH is the best thing since sliced bread. He's got work to do to convince people for sure. But there's no one else waiting in the wings to take over.
I guess my issue is where was this criticism when Mantle was running the club? Most of the things you listed were happening then too. But you slated anyone who said anything then.
As you probably said back then, what good is constant repetitive criticism going to do IFC? By all means criticise when something happens you don't agree with but slagging them off day in day out for the same points - don't see what good that does our club to be honest.
Why not give them pre-season and see what happens? What harm can come from just giving them a chance for a couple of months? You will either be proven right and then I'm sure everyone will be joining you in criticising, or you will be proven wrong and so happy days IFC are doing well.
Message Thread | This response ↓
« Back to index
Responses are not allowed!
Create your own free message board!