Re: h/t
Posted by stoddy on March 15, 2008, 10:19 pm, in reply to "Re: h/t"
90.204.235.103
was against 10 men from the 3rd minute,look like we was not going to score in the first half, then a cock up and we where one down. at half time second half much improved performance just could get a second. and could have lost it as well.
another point they all add up.
|
|
Message Thread:
- h/t - herb March 15, 2008, 4:59 pm
- Re: h/t - alex(club shop) March 15, 2008, 11:29 pm
- Re: h/t - messenger of doom March 15, 2008, 11:48 pm
- Re: h/t - alex(club shop) March 16, 2008, 12:04 pm
- Re: h/t - messenger of doom March 16, 2008, 12:45 pm
- Re: h/t - messenger of doom March 15, 2008, 5:25 pm
- Re: h/t - stoddy March 15, 2008, 10:19 pm
- Re: h/t - tegsa March 15, 2008, 11:06 pm
- Re: h/t - Tom March 16, 2008, 1:12 am
- Re: h/t - Badger March 16, 2008, 2:26 am
- Re: h/t - red ossett March 16, 2008, 3:48 pm
- Re: h/t - alex(club shop) March 16, 2008, 8:35 pm
- Re: h/t - The real RedOssett March 16, 2008, 10:44 pm
- Re: h/t - the worm .. March 17, 2008, 11:05 pm
- Re: h/t - alex(club shop) March 16, 2008, 11:37 pm
- Re: h/t - Neutral Observer March 17, 2008, 7:40 pm
« Back to thread
|
