Re: Gentleman Jim

Posted by Jim Sturdevant '68 on 7/21/2008, 7:40 pm, in reply to "Gentleman Jim"
70.149.224.63

I really believe the first assumption. The second one was a joke.

---

Message Thread: Phil Gramm - DK 7/20/2008, 9:40 am a general person named Lee (general Lee?) - Alex Mutter '65.5 7/20/2008, 9:10 pm Re: a general person named Lee (general Lee?) - Jim Sturdevant '68 7/20/2008, 11:18 pm Gentleman Jim - Alex Mutter 7/21/2008, 11:45 am Re: Gentleman Jim - Jim Sturdevant '68 7/21/2008, 7:40 pm Re: Gentleman Jim - Alex Mutter '65.5 7/21/2008, 7:55 pm Re: Gentleman Jim - Jim Sturdevant '68 7/21/2008, 7:59 pm Medications & Apologies - Alex Mutter '65.5 7/21/2008, 9:42 pm Re: a general person named Lee (general Lee?) - Dave Kaisler 7/21/2008, 2:48 am Re: a general person named Lee (general Lee?) - JGW 7/21/2008, 2:20 am Re: Phil Gramm - Jim Sturdevant '68 7/20/2008, 9:50 am Re: Phil Gramm - DK 7/20/2008, 11:19 am Re: Phil Gramm - Jim Sturdevant '68 7/20/2008, 3:19 pm Re: Phil Gramm - DK 7/20/2008, 4:37 pm « Back to thread

---

Post a Response