Posted by Joyce on 2/23/2007, 10:27 am, in reply to "Re: Acts 13:14 "Beware Lest"" I agree with almost everything you wrote. But don't you think that the fact that Is. 6 was quoted three times and that the first two times there was no dispnesational change lends credence to the fact that the third time also did not include a dispensational change? Please do not misunderstand. I agree that there was a change in dispensations at Acts 28, but I do not agree that the quote of Is. 6 is the sign of it. That is to say, there is such a thing as precedence. If the first two qoutes of Is. 6 did not lead to a dispensational change, that sets a precedence for no change with the third time. I'm just saying that in my opinion, we in the Acts 28 community should re-examine verse 28 as the dispensational boundary. As you may know, I believe that verse 25 is the boundary. In Christ,
205.188.117.73
Dear Chris,
Message Thread
« Back to index