Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

March 26 - This One and His Wife

Posted by Susan T on March 26, 2024, 8:09 am

n/t

This message is locked.

He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by Susan T on March 26, 2024, 8:12 am, in reply to "March 26 - This One and His Wife"

Prince Harry's name appears in US court documents related to a $30million lawsuit claiming that Sean 'Diddy' Combs is a sexual abuser of men and women, MailOnline can reveal today.

Record producer Rodney 'Lil Rod' Jones' filed the bombshell lawsuit against Diddy and claims that his 'affiliation' to the Duke of Sussex and other stars gave him and his associates 'legitimacy'.

The court documents filed in the US last month do not suggest any wrongdoing on Prince Harry's part. He is not a defendant and is named once in the 73-page document. MailOnline has asked the Duke of Sussex to comment.

Lil Rod's lawyers claim guests were drawn to Diddy's alleged sex-trafficking parties because of his 'access to celebrities such as famous athletes, political figures, artist, musicians, and international dignitaries like British Royal, Prince Harry', court documents filed in New York say.

While Harry is not facing a legal claim, it is not the first time the royals have been embroiled in serious court allegations in the US, with Prince Andrew forced to settle a lawsuit brought by Virginia Giuffre, a sex slave of Jeffrey Epstein.

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by Martha on March 26, 2024, 9:13 am, in reply to "He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

‘You shall be known by the company you keep’. When people and venues aren’t vetted you can walk into all kinds of embarrassment. I don’t think Harry was involved with anything unsavory, but the people he involved himself with may have been. Now his name will be mentioned in every article about this case.

===

This message is locked.

Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by Susan T on March 26, 2024, 10:54 am, in reply to "Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

Drugs, including magic mushrooms, are also mentioned in the lawsuit.

This message is locked.

Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by Martha on March 26, 2024, 11:05 am, in reply to "Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

That's what Harry claimed he took at Courtney Cox's house. This could make his visa tenuous.

===

This message is locked.

Taz: Harry named in lawsuit

Posted by Martha on March 26, 2024, 12:27 pm, in reply to "He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

This message is locked.

Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by JohnW on March 26, 2024, 7:02 pm, in reply to "He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

According to stills included in the video posted below, "Royal Grift: Are the Yorks to blame", the lawsuit could equally have named Prince William.

And, spoiler alert, the answer to the question posed is no!

This message is locked.

Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by karenl on March 26, 2024, 7:48 pm, in reply to "Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

Well, the media is acting like this is all been going on with Diddy for the last 15-20 yr. His reputation and his going's on have been the subject of the down low underground since the 90's. The difference is now Lil Rod was brave enough to bring a lawsuit when no one dared to. The phrase is "we hope nothing happens to Lil Rod."
Hollywood will hang with anyone, but it is unfortunate that the Royals didn't have anyone "street savvy" to be in the know about Diddy (and many others). We were surprised when he appeared at Diana's concert, but like Epstein, he has a PR/staff that can cover the bad up. William and Harry were pictured with Diddy and Ye, they didn't know because the Palace didn't know. As for Fergie, she has terrible judgement, she'd hang out with Putin and Kim Jong Un if she'd get the PR and maybe monetary support.

This message is locked.

Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by karenl on March 26, 2024, 8:20 pm, in reply to "Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

I'm just bringing this up the lawsuit stated Diddy's access to etc. etc. and International figures such as...Prince Harry, it leads me to speculate that Diddy lives in Calif. same as Harry and Meghan, perhaps Harry has had contact with Diddy more than just at the Diana Concert. Harry's not on my favorite list right now, but even if he has had contact with Diddy, it isn't an accusation that he knew what was actually going on with Diddy. If proven otherwise or he helped himself to drugs available, that would be a different story.
I mention it because why would Lil Rod include Harry if Harry met Diddy only the one time in 2007.

This message is locked.

Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by Susan T on March 26, 2024, 8:36 pm, in reply to "Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

Why mention somebody as litigious as Harry in your court documents unless you have some sort of proof that Harry and Diddy had been under same roof at the same time during the time period he claims this stuff was going on?

This message is locked.

Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Posted by karenl on March 26, 2024, 9:22 pm, in reply to "Re: He's dragged into lawsuit against Sean 'Diddy' Combs"

Yeah, and it's very interesting that no other names are specifically mentioned ie. celebs, politicians, etc., but Harry's name is. Curious to say the least.

This message is locked.

Royal Grift: Are the Yorks to blame?

Posted by Martha on March 26, 2024, 5:29 pm, in reply to "March 26 - This One and His Wife"

This message is locked.

Re: Royal Grift: Are the Yorks to blame?

Posted by Susan T on March 26, 2024, 6:18 pm, in reply to "Royal Grift: Are the Yorks to blame?"

Gee, and here I was thinking that P Diddy was at the party because he performed at the Diana Concert. That's the way these show biz things work: performers get invited to the afterparty.

Who knew that Fergie had such pull? Not only was she able to snare a ticket for herself to the Diana Concert, she could also get tickets for her friends!

And it was just the luck of the draw that William was assigned the task of knighting Grange. It could have been Anne, or Charles, or the late Queen who worked that particular investiture. The people who bestowed that knighthood were the Honours Committee.

I imagine that, once again, Teflon Fergie will escape unscathed. The media never seems interested in digging deeper no matter who she's linked to.

Trying to remember, wasn't there another event held to honor Diana earlier that year that Fergie was not invited to? I seem to recall the media regarding her invitation to the concert as some sort of consolation prize.

This message is locked.

Re: Royal Grift: Are the Yorks to blame?

Posted by Martha on March 26, 2024, 6:43 pm, in reply to "Re: Royal Grift: Are the Yorks to blame?"

I think it was the memorial service that Fergie wasn’t invited to. Gee, I don’t know why not. It’s not like she’d do all the wrong things for attention and take the focus off of Diana’s memory.

===

This message is locked.

Failed legal bid to reinstate his police protection 'cost the taxpayer more than £500,000'

Posted by Susan T on March 27, 2024, 6:48 pm, in reply to "March 26 - This One and His Wife"

Officials spent £514,128 fighting two separate judicial review claims brought by the Duke of Sussex after his security status was downgraded when he and wife Meghan ceased being working royals and moved to the US.

(snip)

The costs of the two claims will raise questions over a member of the Royal Family launching legal action against the Government.

Before questions are raised and/or it is decided that members of the Royal Family cannot launch legal action against the Government, it might be wise to come up with a legal definition of "Royal Family".

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Failed legal bid to reinstate his police protection 'cost the taxpayer more than £500,000'

Posted by Cynthia on March 27, 2024, 7:04 pm, in reply to "Failed legal bid to reinstate his police protection 'cost the taxpayer more than £500,000'"

I wish he had been ordered to pay the government's legal costs.

The duke of Windsor caused a lot of headaches in his time. I wonder how much he cost the Household and Government from having to deal with all his complaints.

This message is locked.

Re: Failed legal bid to reinstate his police protection 'cost the taxpayer more than £500,000'

Posted by karenl on March 28, 2024, 12:14 am, in reply to "Re: Failed legal bid to reinstate his police protection 'cost the taxpayer more than £500,000'"

Harry has to pay the Govt.'s legal fees plus his own legal fees. Add to that the 750,000 pounds he has to pay for dropping his libel case against ANL. It's no wonder the wife is in a toot to get her "lifestyle" brand going.

This message is locked.

HG Tudor

Posted by karenl on March 28, 2024, 1:24 am, in reply to "Re: Failed legal bid to reinstate his police protection 'cost the taxpayer more than £500,000'"

Tudor discusses Diddy's lawsuit and the mention of Harry. We're all adults, but some of the things listed in the lawsuit are explicit.
It's interesting that this story has been out for over a day now and nothing from Harry or Harry and Meghan. Well, this involves Harry so he's on his own.

This message is locked.

« Back to index

75

[ Royal News and Views ]