Royal News and Views

Royal News and Views
[ Royal News and Views ]

March 12 - This One and His Wife

Posted by Susan T on March 12, 2024, 10:52 am

n/t

This message is locked.

Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'

Posted by Susan T on March 12, 2024, 10:58 am, in reply to "March 12 - This One and His Wife"

n/t

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'

Posted by Martha on March 12, 2024, 12:13 pm, in reply to "Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'"

I agree. Meghan is very practiced in deception and Catherine isn't.

===

This message is locked.

Does anyone else remember this?

Posted by Martha on March 12, 2024, 12:24 pm, in reply to "Re: Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'"

Years ago there was an uproar over a group photo that had William's head photoshopped in from another photo. It was a group photo, and when it was called out the photographer explained that with a large group of people there is always someone blinking, not smiling, yawning, etc. and it's very difficult to get them all facing forward and smiling with their eyes open. The best photo of the bunch had William with his eyes closed in the shot, so it was photoshopped to create a perfect group portrait. The photographer explained that "adjustments" to group photos are made all the time. I looked for the link to the article about this particular outrage to the universe but couldn't find it.

===

This message is locked.

Re: Does anyone else remember this?

Posted by Susan T on March 12, 2024, 12:28 pm, in reply to "Does anyone else remember this?"

It was the group photo taken after Edward's wedding.

This message is locked.

Re: Does anyone else remember this?

Posted by karenl on March 12, 2024, 11:50 pm, in reply to "Re: Does anyone else remember this?"

I remember that story now that it's been brought up. It was a big deal at the time and I didn't see what the fuss was about.

This message is locked.

Re: Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'

Posted by Hollie24 on March 12, 2024, 2:02 pm, in reply to "Re: Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'"

Meghan hires professionals to Photoshop.

This message is locked.

Re: Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'

Posted by karenl on March 12, 2024, 11:56 pm, in reply to "Re: Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'"

In addition, Meghan and Harry are not creative/talented enough to take on photography. It says it when t/hey aren't creative or talented to write their own books or speeches, but have to plagiarize everything and use a ghost writer.
Hollie, you are correct, Meghan hires professionals to Photoshop, neither she nor Harry have room to criticize..Harry's "full head of brown hair and looking 20yr. younger and thinner." Obvious Photoshop, funny social media plus the regular press didn't make a fuss.

This message is locked.

Facing a face hypocrisy row

Posted by Susan T on March 12, 2024, 11:31 pm, in reply to "Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'"

n/t

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Facing a face hypocrisy row

Posted by karenl on March 13, 2024, 12:06 am, in reply to "Facing a face hypocrisy row"

That whole photo that Misan produced was a photoshop. The 2019 Christmas photo was a mess. You could clearly see where Archie's head was photoshopped, you can see the outline. What about the Halloween "family" photo last year? It was passed off as Harry, Meghan and the kids and it clearly wasn't. Not photoshopped, but faked and passed off as real.

This message is locked.

Spokesperson from Archewell deny quoths came from their camp

Posted by Susan T on March 13, 2024, 2:35 pm, in reply to "Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'"

Amid increasing speculation surrounding the Mother's Day image of Kate and her children, which was released to the world by Kensington Palace on Sunday, a spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's Archewell Foundation spoke out to deny that a source close to the couple had made comments about the controversy to Page Six.

Speaking to Newsweek, the spokesperson addressed quotes published by the outlet, which stated that a source 'close to Prince William, Harry and his wife', had not come from inside the Sussexes' camp.

Hold on a minute. I've checked the Page Six article, and it doesn't state the source as being close to Prince William.

see link: Page Six

And it would be nice to see a printed copy of the statement made by the Archewell spokesperson. Though I doubt it also contains any commendation of the bullying that Catherine has received or any requests that the sugars, or at the very least the female sugars, stop bullying another woman who is trying to keep her medical information private.

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Spokesperson from Archewell deny quoths came from their camp

Posted by karenl on March 14, 2024, 12:02 am, in reply to "Spokesperson from Archewell deny quoths came from their camp"

What "source" would be close to the Sussexes and William? There is no "source" as such. The "source speaking" yesterday sounds like their lapboy, Scobie's language. The only reason Harry and Meghan are now "denying/backing off" is due to the fact that their own photoshopped photos are being thrown back in their faces with proof. Their dragging William's name in to try to put up the facade that he's in agreement with them.
I call Scobie a lapboy, calling him a lapdog is an insult to all dogs.

This message is locked.

Misan Harriman has denied any edits were made to pregnancy announcement photo.

Posted by Susan T on March 13, 2024, 2:44 pm, in reply to "Sources close to the couple say it 'isn’t a mistake TOW would ever make'"

During an interview with Mr Harriman on the Private Passions podcast on BBC Radio 3 in 2022, the host made the suggestion the photo had been edited, saying: 'They weren't actually under a willow tree, were they? They were lying outside in a meadow, weren't they?'

Mr Harriman replied: 'Yeah they were lost in their love, at home, in their garden, comfortable, celebrating new joy.'

Today Mr Hariman clarified that he was avoiding a response to a 'leading question' and posted the original photo in colour on X/Twitter this afternoon, plus a screenshot of the edit in which he changed the snap to black-and-white.

Mr Harriman confirmed: 'No trees or meadows were moved or swapped, this is the image straight out of camera.'

He explained he had only made one edit to the photo after it was taken - to change it from a colour photo to black-and-white.

So why was he avoiding answering the question? Was the problem that the next question would be "But there are no willow trees on their property, so where were they when the photo was taken?"

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Re: Misan Harriman has denied any edits were made to pregnancy announcement photo.

Posted by karenl on March 14, 2024, 12:15 am, in reply to "Misan Harriman has denied any edits were made to pregnancy announcement photo."

Not only the willow tree is not on their property, but Harry has a full, luxurious head of hair..again.
I looked at recent photos of Casa del Sussex and there is no "garden" as such. The only places that have lines of trees such as in the photo are next to the adjacent property lines on either side or surrounding the tennis court. It's hard to take any photos on an IPad.
Again, Misan got caught out in this podcast and is trying to back away and not admit he does a lot of photoshopping.

This message is locked.

A judge dismissed Samantha Markle's defamation suit

Posted by Susan T on March 12, 2024, 12:33 pm, in reply to "March 12 - This One and His Wife"

Florida Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell said that the case should be dismissed because Samantha 'failed to identify any statements that could support a claim for defamation'.

In a major victory for the Duchess, Judge Honeywell said Meghan's comments in her Netflix series with Prince Harry or their interview with Oprah Winfrey were true.

The case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning that Samantha will not be able to refile it.

Link: Daily Mail

This message is locked.

Zinger from the Telegraph

Posted by Susan T on March 13, 2024, 3:46 pm, in reply to "March 12 - This One and His Wife"

n/t

Link: Telegraph via MicroSoft Start

This message is locked.

Re: Zinger from the Telegraph

Posted by karenl on March 14, 2024, 12:33 am, in reply to "Zinger from the Telegraph"

That's a pretty good zinger. Driving home this evening on of the US networks has a radio division and the story came up....again. Their reporter in London was just "amazed" when she questioned the public in London about "Kate" and every person told her, "Leave her alone". Take the hint, press.
The press has had a burr about Catherine from literally Day One both in the UK and US. She wasn't a blonde like Diana or "exotic" like Meghan as the insinuations were put out. The press had a field day when William and Catherine broke up, they were practically gleeful.
I just hope this doesn't put a setback on Catherine's recovery, the press and social media will be to blame. Catherine's a strong woman and I think she will handle with support from family. I was thinking earlier that with all this press harping and holier than thou attitude toward his mother, George may turn out to detest the press as much as his father, really all three kids.
I've looked at the Mother's Day photo again today and I can't see anything wrong with it. A lot of utterly useless nonsense.

This message is locked.

Re: Zinger from the Telegraph

Posted by stephen on March 14, 2024, 12:45 am, in reply to "Re: Zinger from the Telegraph"

The Princess of Wales photo conspiracy = Nothing burger

This message is locked.

Re: Zinger from the Telegraph

Posted by Hollie24 on March 14, 2024, 1:28 am, in reply to "Zinger from the Telegraph"

Hahahaha!

This message is locked.

« Back to index

119

[ Royal News and Views ]