Posted by Amir on 6/23/2009, 8:58 am, in reply to "Re: Paul's Contradictions 3"
41.212.203.110
""Paul was a very intelligent man. The argument that he would contradict himself within a few paragraphs doesn't make sense. """
U said it,he was a man not God.A man makes mistake,God doesn t.
""""The argument that millions of Christians have missed obvious contradictions is also highly implausible."""""
This is hilarious.Christians certainly won t acknowledge that Paul contradicted himself.They are going to find good even when he was wrong.Likewise i could apply this reasoning to you.U couldn t find the truth in Islam.So does this mean Islam is not true?Not necessarily because there are others who have found truth in it.This type of reasoning doesn t prove anything.
And i think u are evading the question.What u are saying is that u cannot explain this clear contradiction so instead of explaining it you are changing the topic.It is not necessary to understand the whole book to see that this is a contradiction.
""Amir, your inability (and the same inability among millions of others)to understand Paul's statement is probably the biggest tragedy in Islam.""""
e wrote on another occasion that the mystery was "revealed unto the holy apostles."—Eph. 3:5. This, of course, included himself,as he was an apostle.Here is a profession of holiness from Paul.It sounds somewhat different from being the chief of sinners.
In another place Paul made a profession of Christian perfection: "Let us therefore, as many as be perfect, be thus minded."—Phil. 3:15.Paul thus classes himself with those who had obtained this perfection.The chief of sinners would hardly harmonize in this piece.
If he was a humble man as u claim then how do u harmonise his statements??
Message Thread:
« Back to thread