Posted by Illuminati on 5/6/2009, 11:45 pm, in reply to "Re: Can I move Mountains?"
97.123.10.58
Amir said:
So what if now i would say the same thing:"Illumunati seems to be playing the game of head i win tail u lose.If there is something they can do its considered a miracle like for example christians believers being able to cure cancers by prayers.And if there's something they can't do like moving mountains the its taken to be a parable."
Didn t it occur to u that the prophet Muhammad also spoke in parables?
U said u did not agree with me that the Hadith about the sun prostrating is metaphoric,didn t it occur to u that indeed it was because the sun can t prostrate like we human do.
Didn t it occur to u that if Jesus(Peace be upon him)spoke in parables then Muhammad(SAW) also did the same.
If i can t understand the teachings of Jesus bnecause he spoke in parables the u can understand that of Muhammad(SAW) because u don t believe in him according to your own reasoning.
Amir's criticism of my statements would be valid if I were on this site quoting Jesus' parables to prove that Jesus had scientific information which was not available in His day. Since I have not made that claim for Jesus' parables, Amir's argument fails. Because Amir has made many such claims for Mohammad, my criticism of his arguments stands.
Amir is using Muslim writings to "prove" that Mohammad had advanced scientific knowledge. He claims that these statements must be miracles. When I point out hadiths which are totally unscientific, Amir claims that they don't count because they are parables. If a passage supports Amir's claim, he accepts it as a literal statement, but if a passage does not agree with Amir's claim, he automatically places it in the category of a parable. In other words, Amir is using circular logic similar to those who flip a coin and say, "heads I win, tails you lose."
Message Thread:
« Back to thread